Frontenac House Quartet 2005 Series:
Between the Silences, Diane Buchanan
Puti/White, Patria Rivera
Invisible Foreground, David Bateman
Re: Zoom, Sheri-D Wilson
Reviewed by Richard Stevenson
Back again, and, yet again, the formula is working: put
out a call,
announce contest deadlines for the best four poetry
manuscripts, wait
for the poet hopefuls, penny dreadfuls, wailing,
whirling wannabes, to
storm the gates; sit back, begin the terrible winnowing
of manuscripts.
By now, Frontenac House's annual competition must offer
four of the
most-sought-after slots in the poetry biz in Canada. I
have no idea of
the number of manuscripts submitted, of course, but the
buzz in
Alberta certainly is palpable, and there appears to be
no end in sight
of worthy contestants.
The trick with an eclectic press like Frontenac, it
seems to me, is how
to stay fresh; how to increase the breadth of your
aesthetic; how to
widen the net to admit more fishes; how to continually
come up with new
voices, new directions. Part of the secret, of course,
is good press;
more important, I believe, are the production values,
the quality of
the editing, the effort in the distribution and
publicity departments.
All of these things insure a good run at the gate, of
course, but how
can they possibly insure variety and innovation? For
the answer to
that question, you have to look at editor/publisher
Rose Scollard's
track record -- not just her record as a savvy business
woman, but at
her catholicity of taste, and her ability to find the
fast horses
within the aesthetic lanes she's prepared to add to the
track each
year.
Inevitably, some of those fast horses will falter and
stumble
occasionally, as, indeed, they do here. Yet, over-all,
I sense no
diminution in the quality of the series. But, on to
the particulars.
First, the range. This year, Frontenac has chosen to
include
straightforward realist narrative in a linked sequence;
socio-political, post-colonial lyric/narrative, with a
third world
feminist twist; post-modern, gay spoken word
performance, with equal
dollops of neo-surrealist obliquity and metaphysical
wit; and feminist,
Beat performance poetry. If the attempt to categorize
this year's poets makes you laugh, so be it: I certainly found
myself more than a
little bemused while reaching for each section of
academic fence in
attempting to corral these fast horses. I also found
myself making
quick provisional judgments, and having to go back to
re-evaluate my
assessments on more than one occasion.
*
Initially, I was put off by the seemingly prosaic
caliber of the work
in poet Dianne Buchanan's second collection, for
example. Certainly,
the lines are balder, more matter-of-fact; the
aesthetic closer to a
demotic prose rendering of subject than the lines and
aesthetic
approaches of the other three poets under
consideration. Indeed, I
kept finding myself muttering that old creative writing
saw, "show, don't tell," as I turned the pages of Between The
Silences, and
wondering where the rifts of ore were to be found in
the individual
poems. Give me metaphor, reach I mumbled; only
connect. My creative
writing teachers have taught me well, and I was quite
prepared to go to
church for the next available old saw.
But then the accumulative effect of the various pieces
started to work
the way fiction works; I found myself moving away from
the aesthetic
and more toward the argument, the concatenation of
telling detail in
assessing the reach of the book.
Certainly, Buchanan risks a lot in presenting her
findings in such an
unvarnished, un- -- one is tempted to say anti- --
poetic way. The
readability and easily-accessed availability of
narrative surface is,
of course, one of the risks of the anecdotal approach,
particularly
when the poet prefers the open, ragged edged strophe to
any nonce
rendering of stanza and verse, and employs a demotic
prose line. So my
main criticism of this collection would be its lack of
texture and
sub-text, but it also occurs to me that you could turn
that criticism
around and simply say this is the least
self-consciously arty of the
four books too. A matter of personal taste perhaps.
But let me show
you what I mean; let me juxtapose a couple of
sections, they way they
appear, enface, in the opening narrative sequence, "In
Youth Docket Court," from section one, Youth Court:
A young man enters
the prisoner's box, hands
cuffed behind his back.
He looks over
the spectators
searching
hopefully
for just one
familiar face.
When none appear,
his face
hardens
into cruel resolve.
|
A girl in high boots
and miniskirt is called
Before the judge.
She stands
--
the lawyers talk,
the judge talks,
and she is diminished
Nobody really looks,
nobody really sees,
nobody asks her
She becomes --
nobody
|
You can see the point: two people being rendered into
bloodless,
non-individual
defendants. The parallel phrasing creates a kind of
bookends effect.
This book works the way good courtroom drawings work.
Heather Spear's,
for instance. If the writing seems a little more naive than Ms. Spear's writing on the Lena Virk case, for instance, it
nevertheless,
renders with quick, deft strokes, the heart of the
matter, and the
accumulative effect of all this portraiture and careful
observation
serves, as the title so aptly indicates, how important
it is to find
the human element, and how woefully lacking our
jurisprudence system
is, from the very set-up of the raised dais of the
judge and harsh
boxes of the courtroom to the subtle boxing and
squaring off of
legalese. The demotic prose, in other words, belies
the subtlety in
observation; one needs to read between the lines of
what is said and
what is revealed. I could have done without the
glossary though: I
found it a little insulting, since there were few terms
there that weren't in common parlance.
*
My initial reaction to the opening poems of Patria Rivera's collection, Puti/White, was similar:
where's the beef? This
collection, though,
also has an accumulative effect, and is infinitely more
varied in
approach. The poems range from straightforward
narrative to
hallucinatory lyric reverie; the language, from bald,
demotic prose
line to burnished lapidarian Neruda/Vallejo
lyric/metaphoric/symbolic
utterance. This may be Ms. Rivera's first full-length
collection, but she's obviously been around the block a few times and
she was a
delightful discovery for this reader.
The poet was born and raised in the Philippines and
brings the
experience of guerilla theatre and hard luck political
awareness and
analysis with her. As someone who's pursued media
studies in Sydney,
Australia, and Berlin; and as a poet and editor who now
lives with her
family in Toronto's east end, she carries not only a
lot of political
baggage, but a lot of feminist moxie. She is also
equally adept at
open strophes in the Olson-Creeleyesque proprioceptive,
minimalist
style as she is in nonce form, triplet-laced lyric and
leaping image
prose poem forms; she writes in both open and closed
forms too, turns a
mean line, and is capable of wringing all the
subtleties out of
enjambment, syntactical and lexical ambiguity that
accompany careful
use of phonological phrases.
I found the second half of the book much richer than
the first, almost
as though this were a journeyman book: one that shows
how far she's traveled, not only across the planet, but from first
published poems to
where she is now.
Quite simply put, this is an excellent book, and a most
welcome debut.
Not since Rienzi Crusz's debut, have I tasted such rich
language and
succulent turns of phrase:
I carried my sorrow onto the waiting road,
into the swiftly descending dusk,
past the tangle of shrubs and pine trees,
the jacinths unaware of the waning moon.
Rain, blind, followed wind, butting asphalt,
roofs, foliage, the neighbourhood of desires.
There were big drops, heavy as restoration,
curved, diagonal, colliding, breaking up
into tiny droplets, like pulses skittering
Mmm, tasty. Not much to bitch about there, except
maybe for the
expletive construction of the first line of the last
triplet quoted.
Patria Rivera's beat, if you haven't guessed it, is the
experience of
exile -- from place, culture, language, ritual, custom,
extended family. What I particularly
admire though
is the lightness of touch: we don't get any of the
heavy-handed
bible-thumping moralizing, of, say, the negritude
poets, though it's clear the poet has read her Senghor and U- Tam Si, and
a good deal
else. She's not a Confessionalist, though her work is
rich with
familial detail; she's not a hermetic symbolist, though
her work is
ripe with image and metaphor. She makes me long for
Nigerian mangoes,
not the store-ripened, flat-tasting simulacra we buy in
the supermarket
here: she offers a feast for hungry ears.
*
David Bateman, the gay performance artist of the group,
is
astonishingly good, and it shouldn't matter a flying
fuck what his
sexual preference is, or how openly graphic the imagery
, or how
androgynous his mother on the motorcycle image of the
cover is, or what
side of the political spectrum you come from, or what
banner you're hiding under. If you don't read gay poets because you're straight and
don't think a homosexual glamour puss has anything to
say to you about
hetero- or any other-flavoured sexuality or lifestyle
orthodoxy, or you
side with the bozos that would prevent homosexuals from
the basic right
of marriage the rest of us enjoy, shame on you: go out
and buy this
book! Buy it for the language play, the wit, the
humour, the stand-up
timing; hell, buy it because it's good for you: you'll learn a lot
about what Scottish poet W.S. Graham used to say the
language is using
us for. Your mother would approve: Bateman's that damn
good!
I was unfamiliar with this poet before I read this
book; now I'm grateful to have made his acquaintance. I laughed, I
guffawed, I
grinned, I winced. I had the damn flu when I read
this book and I couldn't put it down until I sucked the marrow out of
its bones. If
you are at all interested in where the page meets the
stage, you want
to read this book.
The qualities I admire most are the honesty, the
directness, the leaps
of logic and imagery, the wit and wordplay. If I had to
sum up the
talent displayed here in a single word, I'd say nimble.
The man is
showing a lot of us untutored louts how to dance too,
by God, and here's the kicker: I'm an old fart who's been around
the block and
read a lot of poetry myself, but here's a guy who's showing me all
kinds of new moves -- not just in how to get from image
to image or idea
to idea, with a little pas de deux mixed in with the
stomp and tap
dance clickety clack, but what the hell a poem can be
as well!
Most poems I've read in a performance vein don't stand
up on the page;
his most often do. Most of the rhetoric necessary to
create the
incantatory effects and rollicking rhythms of
performance seem forced
or so much dross on the page; his rhetoric doesn't.
Most performance
poets are bombastic; hector, harangue, pontificate;
David Bateman has
you slobbering like a spaniel with a big wet kisser and
following him
from phrase to phrase, page to page, like you deserved
praise or a head
pat for being there. You'll follow him anywhere, and he'll take you on
some pretty interesting tours of yer neighbourhood too,
by Jesus.
His beat is as wide as the world and as narrow and
parochial as your
back yard, though admittedly backlit with preternatural
moon glow.
Imagine David Trinidad with ants in his pants, or
Denise Duhamel's Kinky Barbie dolls all kicking up their gams and
kicking out the jams
or pogo jumping to Iggy Pop and the Stooges: he's assimilated a lot of
pop culture influences from Hollywood musicals, the
bitchy/witty
dialogue of Joe Orson, Harvey Fierstein, Tony Kushner,
Sky Gilbert and
others; the droll delivery of Jones or Charles
Bukowski; a little of
the New York School Poets, Frank O'Hara and early John
Ashbery; but his
diction zings and pops with the polyphonic zeal and
chance
collisions/juxtapositions of August Kleinzahler or Po
Mo language poets
like Ron Silliman and performance poets like the Green
Mill slammers
and Nuyurican crowd. He drops allusions to T.S. Eliot
and Tammy
Wynette without ever wearing his learning on his sleeve
or punning in
ways that make you groan. Yet the elements gell into a
unique voice and
style. Most of the poems take a long while to get
rolling, rather like
a shaggy dog story, so it's hard to excerpt quotations
that would do
justice to the ground covered, but let me show you a
couple of quick
quips in their entirety:
My Poetry
lies somewhere between political critique
and the label on the back of a box of potpourri
scathing insight and room deodorizer
lavender and blue
*
Two thirds haiku on trans gender
( for Tammy Wynette )
sometimes it makes me
hard to be a woman
The longer poems, of course, have more sweep and depth.
Fabulous poet.
*
Re: Zoom (resume, re-zoom, etc) is vintage Sheri-D
Wilson, with the
added satiric kicker of typographic play with the
conventions of
e-mail: the use of the RE: header in various punning
configurations and
back formations, prefixes, pre-prefixes and what not,
the use of the
chevrons with return and return return return messages,
play with CAPS
(Yelling in e-mail; here more like sidebar snickers and
stage
directions.), the double use of colons to introduce or
double stall
clauses, phrases or words, offset stage comments or
juxtapose the
analytical sub-textual voice against the great swatches
of rollicking
jazz improv-like strophes or droplines that tell us
when to drop the
pitch of our reading voice. How cute or clever the
reader finds these
typographical elements is largely a matter of taste.
Suffice to say
they don't interfere with the poet's signature mouth
music and punning
leaps of sound and logic. One can ignore them and
still read the text
straight for the narrative through-line, or stop and
catch the
syntactical and lexical ambiguities along the way,
rather like bird
watching from the car.
The most effective aspect of the Reply or Reply All
commands is the
way the conventions allow the poet to play with
intertextual glosses on
earlier poems -- earlier in the collection or earlier in
other books.
Sometimes I found the punning and leaping, multiple
margin use of
phonological phrases, and bits and pieces of language a
bit precious,
or wanting a little more restraint or line editing, but
I suspect the
effects work better in performance than they do on the
page anyway.
Likewise some poems are slighter than others, and a few
seem like
freefall journal entries that haven't found their
footing or aren't really developed the way the best of her poems in
earlier books are. I didn't find any great falling off in the wit and humour
departments
though, and Sheri-D manages to skewer or lance most of
the targets with
the poniard point of her acid pen. So readers familiar
with her
earlier work will hear the same feminist Beat verve
driving the engine
here.
The term jazz poetry is often used to describe Sheri-D Wilson's work,
and certainly the connotation of improvisation fits.
Poems proceed as
much by the linkage of cognate sound, shifts in
internal vowels, hip
hop or slam poetry rhythms, and by etymology as by
image motif or
narrative trajectory. The puns and connections are
frequently
surprising and delightful. Indeed, I detect a lot more
language school
architecture in these poems than in earlier work, and
echoes of
bissett, Moure, Marlatt, and other more
self-consciously based
post-structural theorist poets, but the poems never get
bogged down in
their own cleverness or tendency to footnote the
footnotes the way,
say, Charles Bernstein's work frequently does, and the
average educated
poetry reader is more likely to allow for the
self-indulgent bop solo
here and there as all of the signs, bits of syntax,
graphemes, quirks
and quarks of lexiconjury are set spinning in the
cyclotron of open
form poetics than s/he would with so many of the more
deliberately
obtuse language poets.
Sheri-D's improvisations are more like Ornette Coleman's Prime Time
band improvs with the Master musicians of Joujouka than
like his
earlier free jazz experiments; the insistent rhythms
hold them to
ground while she spins endlessly inventive melodic
skeins over the top.
You never stop tapping your toes or bobbing your head
through the
weave.
Is she "one of the finest poets in Canada, if not the
world, including Vancouver," as musician Jann Arden riffs in her cover
puff? No, I don't think so: far from it. She's certainly one of
the best
performance poets I've heard, and one really does need
to hear her work
to get the full effect of the rollicking wit, but she's challenged
herself here to move beyond Naropa and the Beat poetic,
and it will be
interesting to see where these various concrete and
language school
developments take her. I hope she doesn't stray too
far from her
working and middle-class roots because she's always
been one of those
poets who redeem the art form for the non-literary
audience poetry has
always hoped to re-capture. As her CD, Sweet Taste of Lightning, makes
abundantly clear, the commingling of jazz improvisation
and spoken word
still has a lot more to offer than any of the Beat/
Boppers of the
early and mid-fifties managed to realize.
*
To sum up then, we have another good crop, and a huge
range in poetics
here: both argue for the continued success of a series
I now look
forward to every year. All you poets out there should
check the web
site for details of next year's contest. You won't find many presses
out there with as wide a range of aesthetic taste, and
how bad can that
be for the future of poetry in Canada. Granting
bodies, your money's well spent here.
Richard Stevenson is usually far less prolix and has
taken to
writing haiku, senryu, and tanka lately, in fact. He
still teaches at
Lethbridge Community College in southern Alberta. New
books include A
Charm of Finches, Parrot With Toilette's, and Flicker
at the Fascia. A
jazz poetry chapbook, children's picture book, memoir,
and further
adventures in haikai literature are forthcoming.
|