[Table of Contents]
|
|
Canada Communicable Disease Report
- Supplement
Volume: 23S8
December 1997
INFECTION CONTROL GUIDELINES
Preventing Infections Associated with Indwelling Intravascular
Access Devices
Quality Assurance and Improvement
Measures to minimize the risk of infection associated with intravascular
therapy must strike a balance between patient safety, cost-effectiveness,
and pragmatism. As knowledge, technology and health care settings change,
infection control and prevention measures must change. This implies the
need for well-organized programs that provide, monitor and evaluate care,
as well as for the education of all involved. Reports spanning the past
two decades have consistently found that risk of infection declines following
standardization of aseptic care(10-14). Specialized "IV teams",
a logical consequence of this evidence, have documented effectiveness(15,16).
However, the cost-effectiveness of such teams and the extent to which
their impact is due to increased skill rather than increased staffing
are unclear.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Program Organization
-
Written policies and procedures concerning infection prevention in
the administration of intravascular therapy should be included in
the infection prevention program of each institution or organization,
and should be reviewed at least annually(3). (Category
A; Grade III)
-
Each institution or organization should ensure access to the expert
advice of physicians, intravascular therapy nurse specialists, pharmacists,
and infection control practitioners in maintaining its policies and
procedures(3). (Category A; Grade III)
-
Each organization should ensure that an effective surveillance system
is in place to identify intravascular-associated infections(3).
(Category A; Grade III)
- Personnel
- Each institution or organization should ensure that all those providing
care, including emergency response attendants, nurses and physicians,
maintain a high level of skill through regularly scheduled training
and adhere to approved policies and procedures pertinent to intravascular
therapy. An IV therapy team will facilitate maintenance of a high level
of skill(17). (Category A; Grade I)
- Patients should have timely access to skilled practitioners throughout
the duration of intravascular therapy. (Category A; Grade III)
- Patient education
- Each institution or organization should ensure that patients understand
the nature of the intravascular therapy they are receiving, the importance
of hand washing, asepsis and other safety measures, recognize early
indications of infection or other complications, and know to whom they
should report complications. (Category B; Grade III)
- The method of delivery and extent of education provided should be
tailored to meet the needs of the individual patient. (Category B;
Grade III)
-
Surveillance of intravascular device-associated infections
- Clear definitions of intravascular device-associated infections
should be established. These may differ from those used for clinical
or research purposes. Since patients may not recognize the signs
and symptoms of infection(18), outpatient and home care
intravascular therapy services must be particularly diligent to
ensure effective teaching and monitoring of patients(3).
(Category A; Grade III)
- Rates of infection should be expressed in terms of infections
per 1,000 device-days, stratified by type of device and patient
group. Rates of device use should also be evaluated(19).
(See Appendix IV for an example of how
to calculate rates per 1,000 device-days.) The procedures used for
data collection and the personnel to be involved should be determined
according to the needs and resources of a given organization. Analysis
and reporting of infection rates may be continuous or periodic,
at the discretion of individual organizations. Documentation of
intravascular device use and related procedures is essential to
an effective surveillance program. The minimum documentation required
includes insertion sites, type(s) of device, procedure or therapy,
date inserted or replaced, date removed, and individual performing
the procedure. (Category A; Grade III)
- Compliance with intravascular therapy policies and procedures
regarding insertion technique and care of insertion sites and devices
should be evaluated on a regular basis. (Category A; Grade III)iv)
Infection rates should be evaluated in three ways:
by comparing rate of infections against external "best-of-practice"
examples (Benchmarking [see Appendix III]);
by comparing rate of infections with published rates in the
literature (see Table 5, Appendix IV);
and
by monitoring the rate over time to detect trends. (Category
B; Grade III)
-
The optimal time limit for replacing catheters, administration sets,
or fluid containers depends upon individual circumstances. Duration
of use limits and the priority assigned to corrective measures should
be established relative to reported aggregate infection rates and,
where possible, to established benchmarks. Facilities that fail to
achieve low infection rates should consider adopting more conservative
limits. (Category B; Grade III)
[Previous]
[Table of Contents] [Next]
|