Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

E-mail this page





Summary of Outcomes

Table 8 summarizes outcomes for women within the target age group (50 to 69 years) by province. Quebec data capture information for the 1998 screen year only. Overall, the Canadian averages are in line with the standards of other national breast screening programs. The volume of screens and the proportion that are first screens varies greatly among provinces reflecting the length of time each program has been in operation. Abnormal recall rates drop substantially on subsequent screening as prevalent cancers are screened out in the initial screening round and previous films are available for comparison to current examinations. The abnormal recall rate is similar at third and fourth screens compared to second screens.

 

Table 8
Screening outcome summary by program, women aged 50-69
at screening, 1997 and 1998 screen years

Outcome

B.C.*

Alta.

Sask.

Man.**

Ont.**

Que.

N.B.

N.S.§

Nfld**

Canada

Number of screens

190,013

35,520

53,472

42,135

142,982

43,587

27,444

28,819

10,123

574,095

Number of first screens

57,302

15,714

8,718

31,033

59,619

43,587

16,278

9,738

7,012

249,001

Abnormal recall rate (%)
    Initial  screen
    Rescreen


11.0
4.9


6.4
3.5


15.5
5.9


9.1
6.4


14.7
9.2


9.8


9.8
8.2


8.1
4.2


10.8
7.7


11.1
6.2

Number of cancers

866

185

251

226

831

115

162

57

2,693

Cancer detection rate per 1,000 screens
    Initial  screen
    Rescreen



6.9
3.6



6.4
4.2



6.6
4.3



5.9
4.0



7.0
5.0






4.2



7.3
4.8



5.7
5.5



6.7
4.2

PPV of abnormal screen (%)

7.3

11.2

6.3

6.5

5.3

6.1

10.3

5.8

6.6

Benign to malignant open biopsy ratio

1.6:1

1.6:1

1.9:1

1.9:1

1.4:1

2.6:1

1.6:1

1.0:1

2.3:1

1.6:1

Benign to malignant core biopsy ratio

1.5:1

1.5:1

3.6:1

2.1:1

4.3:1

2.7:1

2.0:1

6.3:1

2.2:1

In situ (DCIS) cancers (%)

24.4

20.0

15.9

17.3

16.1

26.2

13.0

23.5

19.3

19.7

Node negative (%), (invasive only)

80.3

75.0

77.0

77.5

76.4

82.0

86.2

75.6

78.5

Invasive tumour size (%) <= 10mm

36.9

31.7

35.0

38.7

39.8

38.8

40.0

38.8

34.1

37.6

*    The recall interval was annual in BC until mid-1997 and biennial in other provinces.
**    Screening visit includes mammography and complete clinical breast examination.
†    The Quebec program has incomplete cancer information due to incomplete data linkages. Therefore, some cancer-related data for Quebec are not reported. Data for 1998 only.
‡    Data for the New Brunswick program are incomplete and therefore do not comprehensively reflect program activity.
§    Screening visit includes mammography and modified clinical breast examination by technician.
¶    Missing values were excluded from calculations.
—    Not available


Figure 12
Positive predictive value of abnormal screening by age group, 1997 and 1998

Positive predictive value of abnormal screening by age group, 1997 and 1998

Notes: Quebec data not included. Data for the New Brunswick program are incomplete and therefore do not comprehensively reflect program activity.


Cancer detection rates per 1,000 screens compare favourably with the UK and Australian program standards. Positive predictive values were highest in Alberta and Nova Scotia, where abnormal recall rates were the lowest.

Nova Scotia’s open biopsy yield ratio is particularly noteworthy. A low benign to malignant biopsy yield ratio reflects the overall effectiveness of the diagnostic evaluation in minimizing the number of women who do not have cancer but who undergo invasive procedures. Nova Scotia’s team approach to diagnosis involving the primary care physician, diagnostic radiologist, pathologist, and surgeon and frequent use of imaging-directed core biopsy has greatly decreased the need for surgery in benign lesions of the breast22.


The 1997 and 1998 results show that organized breast screening programs in Canada compare favourably with the standards set by other countries.



Tumour size and lymph node status are reliable determinants of survival23. Mammography screening aims to prevent breast cancer deaths by detecting tumours at an early stage and while they are lymph node negative. Canadian breast screening programs are on track with the standards set by other countries.

Table 9 summarizes screening outcomes by age group. Most screens were within the target age group of women aged 50 to 69. The proportion of first screens was highest among women aged 50 to 59 (47.9%) and lowest in women aged 70 and over (28.5%). The abnormal recall rate differed little among age groups. The cancer detection rate increased with age, as did the positive predictive value of abnormal screening. A high positive predictive value reflects the effectiveness of screening by determining the proportion of women who had an abnormal screen and were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The benign to malignant biopsy ratio was high in women aged 40 to 49, but improved with age. Older women had more favourable prognostic indicators (i.e. small tumour size, node negative).

Table 9
Screening outcome summary by age group, 1997 and 1998 screen years

Outcome

40-49

50-59

60-69

70+

All Ages

Number of screens

155,670

330,211

243,884

112,265

842,030

Number of first screens

70,780
(45.5%)

158,300
(47.9%)

90,701
(37.2%)

32,027
(28.5%)

351,808
(41.8%)

Abnormal recall rate (%)
    Initial screen
    Rescreen


11.1
5.4


11.5
6.4


10.4
6.0


11.3
5.9


11.1
6.0

Number of cancers*

326

1,331

1,362

956

3,975

Cancer detection rate per 1,000* screens
    Initial screen
    Rescreen



2.6
1.8



5.6
3.5



8.7
4.8



13.3
7.1



6.4
4.2

PPV of abnormal screen (%)*

2.5

5.0

8.8

12.6

6.1

Benign to malignant open biopsy ratio

4.5:1

2.0:1

1.2:1

0.7:1

1.6:1

Benign to malignant core biopsy ratio

4.6:1

2.8:1

1.5:1

0.8:1

2.1:1

In situ (DCIS) cancers (%)*

31.9

22.1

17.0

16.6

19.8

Node negative (%), (invasive only)*

75.0

78.0

78.6

84.4

79.5

Invasive tumour size (%) <= 10mm*

29.6

35.0

39.9

41.7

38.0

*    The Quebec program has incomplete cancer information due to incomplete data linkages. Therefore, some cancer-related data for Quebec are not reported.

Note: Data for the New Brunswick program are incomplete and therefore do not comprehensively reflect program activity.

Table 10 summarizes screening outcomes for women aged 50 to 69 for the screen years 1996, 1997, and 1998. The number of screens and cancers detected increased from 1996 to 1998 as new programs began. The proportion of first screens was higher in 1998 due to the inception of Quebec’s screening program and expansion of other programs. Given an increase in the number of screening programs, the overall outcome statistics remained stable during the 3-year period and were generally within the standards set by other countries for most indicators.

Table 10
Screening outcome summary by year,
women aged 50-69 at screening

Outcome

Year of Screen

1996

1997

1998

Number of screens

215,717

246,431

327,664

Number of first screens

76,900
(35.7%)

93,189
(37.8%)

155,812
(47.6%)

Abnormal recall rate (%)
     Initial screen
     Rescreen


11.2
5.5


10.9
5.9


11.2
6.5

Number of cancers*

1,053

1,317

1,376

Cancer detection rate per 1,000 screens*
     Initial screen
     Rescreen


6.7
3.9


7.0
4.3


6.4
3.9

PPV of abnormal screen (%)*

6.7

7.1

6.1

Benign to malignant open biopsy ratio

1.5:1

1.5:1

1.7:1

Benign to malignant core biopsy ratio

1.9:1

1.8:1

2.5:1

In situ (DCIS) cancers (%)*

17.6

18.2

20.8

Node negative (%), (invasive only)*

77.1

77.3

79.4

Invasive tumour size (%) <= 10mm*

36.2

36.8

38.4

*  The Quebec program has incomplete cancer information due to incomplete data linkages.
    Therefore, some cancer-related data for Quebec are not reported.
†    Number of cancers as a proportion of screens with completed follow-up.
‡    Expressed as a proportion of invasive cancers with complete data on tumour size or number of positive nodes.

Note: Data for the New Brunswick program are incomplete and therefore do not comprehensively reflect program activity.

[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]