Operations
Memoranda (OM) - Overseas Processing
Manual
OP, IP, PE |
OM number
OP 02-42, PE 02-37, IP 02-13 |
Date
June 25, 2002 |
NHQ policy
file no. |
IMM 0750 no.
2002-51 |
Title
Immigration
and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) - Changes to the Immigration
Medical Assessment Process |
Type
of OM
[ x
]
For eventual manual text
[ ]
Not destined for manual text (one-time
instruction only) |
NHQ
Contact
Immigration Health Policy and Standards
(HMP) (613) 957-5939 |
Branch
Medical Services |
Expiry
date:
N/A |
ISSUE
Changes to the immigration
medical assessment (IMA) process resulting from the introduction of IRPA.
IRPA AND REGULATIONS
The Immigration
and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is expected to be proclaimed on
June 28, 2002.
IRPA, Section 38(1),
incorporates Sections 19(1)(a)(i) and 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Immigration
Act 1976, and breaks them down into three separate components: (a)
public health; (b) public safety; and (c) excessive demand.
The major health-related
change in IRPA is Section 38(2) that describes those individuals who are
exempted from an excessive demand assessment.
The relevant health-related
Act and regulations sections are included in Annex
A.
APPLICANTS EXEMPTED
FROM EXCESSIVE DEMAND ASSESSMENT
From an operational
perspective, those applicants exempted from excessive demand assessment
include the following:
- Sponsored members
of the Family Class:
- A sponsor’s spouse
or conjugal partner and the sponsor’s dependent children (where conjugal
partner includes common-law partner or same sex partner);
- A dependent child,
legally adopted or biological (including adult dependants over 22,
who are medically dependent);
- A child to be
adopted by a sponsor.
- Convention Refugees
and in-Canada refugee claimants.
- Persons in need
of urgent protection.
- The dependents
of (a), (b) and (c) above.
THE NEW IMMIGRATION
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT (IMA) PROCESS
It is the responsibility
of the medical (health) officer to provide an IMA, which is an opinion
regarding the admissibility of an applicant on health grounds.
Following proclamation,
all medical assessments, including those pending or in progress
will be governed by the IRPA.
- All applicants
determined to require a medical examination will undergo the standard
immigration medical examination, including routine laboratory tests.
- It is anticipated
that the class of applicant will be indicated on the IMM1017 issued
by a visa/immigration officer and then submitted by the Designated Medical
Practitioner (DMP) for IMA.
- Applicants identified
as being excessive demand exempt (EDE) should not be investigated by
the DMP or furthered for additional information by a Medical Officer
(MOF) in terms of excessive demand. Applicants who are EDE will still
require assessment for public health and public safety. Such applicants
may require further work-up for any public health or public safety concerns.
- When the class
of applicant is not identified, the case will be assessed based on each
of the three criteria required by IRPA Section 38(1):
- public health;
- public safety;
and
- excessive demand.
On June 3, 2002, International
Health Operations (HMI) e-mailed Overseas MOFs separate instructions to
assist MOFs and DMPs in the identification and processing of EDE applicants.
These instructions are called "Immigration and Refugee Protection
Act: Instructions pertaining to certain classes of applicants exempted
from the excessive demand determination".
IMMIGRATION MEDICAL
ASSESSMENT (IMA) OUTCOME
The IMA outcome will
be captured in two ways:
- completion of a
Medical Notification form IMM5365 (Annex B) which acts as a worksheet
to capture the data for electronic entry. This form will become the
official document for capturing data and notifying visa/immigration
officers of inadmissible cases, replacing the MS1014; and
- electronic entry
in the Immigration Medical System (IMS) computer database or into FOSS.
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT
CODING
Following IRPA proclamation,
there will be changes to the medical assessment coding system.
A new medical assessment
coding system will be developed to capture only those components dictated
by IRPA. In the meantime, the H T and E criteria have been redefined.
Until a new coding system is created, H, T and E should be entered as
"1" into IMS for all applicants.
The key medical assessment
components will be a D criterion, an S criterion and an
M category to reflect the components of IRPA.
Note: There are
new definitions for some of the H, D, T, S, E and M codes – see below
and Annex C.
All EDE applicants
will have D8 and M7 as part of the assessment coding. EDE
cases where the applicant is a Danger to Public Health and/or a Danger
to Public Safety will have a Dual M Coding - see below.
M Category
Assessment codes are
M1 through M7.
- M1 - no
public health risk or danger, no public safety danger and no excessive
demand.
Note: M1
must not be used for EDE cases which will be coded M7.
- M2 - Potential
risk to public health. Medical surveillance required. Conditional
entry recommended if granted entry to Canada.
Many applicants
may not present a "danger" to public health (e.g. active
infectious tuberculosis (TB)) but may be a "risk" if
they have a communicable disease that could reactivate (e.g. inactive
tuberculosis). These latter individuals require medical surveillance
and conditional entry, and hence require the S2.nn notification.
- M3 – A health
condition(s) is present but is not expected to place an excessive demand
on health or social services.
Note: All significant
health conditions identified should be documented on the medical notification
form along with the relevant ICD code(s) and an appropriate narrative.
M3 must not be
used for EDE cases which will be coded M7.
- M4 - Inadmissible
due to Danger to Public Health, e.g. Active Infectious TB.
- M5 - Inadmissible
due to Excessive Demand on health and social services.
Note: All cases
likely to create excessive demand, regardless of the potential response
to treatment, will now be assessed M5.
- M6 - Inadmissible
due to Danger to Public Safety, e.g. psychopathic personality.
- M7 - Excessive
Demand Exempt (EDE)
Note: M7 will
always be combined with D8 to reflect that the medical assessment
is based on the fact that the applicant is EDE.
Applicants
who are EDE, but have health conditions which would otherwise be assessed
M5, will be assessed M7. The narrative should highlight that:
- the applicant
has identified health condition(s) (specify the condition(s) and
provide ICD code(s)),
- the applicant
has been assessed as EDE, and
- a new medical
assessment is required if the category of application changes.
- the medical
validity date – this must be indicated (see Medical Validity
section below).
This information
will assist in resettlement planning for refugees and persons in need
of protection, as well as indicate the need for issuing health follow-up
handouts.
Narrative Example:
"Diabetes
mellitus ICD: 250
The applicant
has diabetes mellitus which may require significant Canadian health
or social services if applicant were granted entry to Canada. This
applicant has been assessed as excessive demand exempt (EDE) and
will require a new medical assessment if the applicant’s immigration
category changes."
The medical
is valid until [dd/mmm/yyyy].
Medical Validity
Owing to the use of
M7 for EDE cases, the medical validity does not currently upload from
IMS into CAIPS. Thus, for EDE cases, it is critical that medical validity
be captured in the medical narrative, as indicated in the example above.
Note: It is
imperative that visa office staff manually enter the medical
validity date for EDE applicants into CAIPS to support the CAIPS generation
of immigration documents, e.g. IMM1000/Permanent Resident Card.
Dual M Coding
The M code can have
two numerical values when more than one component of the assessment criteria
is present.
Applicants who are
M3 and require medical surveillance will be coded M2/3 as before.
For technical reasons,
it is not possible to code EDE applicants who require medical surveillance
as M2/7. Such applicants will have to be coded D8, S2.nn, and M7 with
a narrative clearly stating the need for medical surveillance.
All EDE applicants
will have D8 and M7 as part of the assessment coding. Those
EDE applicants who are either a Public Health Danger or a Public Safety
Danger will be D8 and M4/7 or D8 and M6/7.
Persons in need of
protection who are M4/7 or M6/7 require special communication between
the medical officer, visa officer and Port of Entry officers to ensure
safe transportation of these individuals and appropriate management on
entry to Canada.
Those EDE applicants
assessed as both a Public Health Danger and Public Safety
Danger should be assessed D8 and M4/7 with a strong narrative to
flag the public safety concerns to the immigration officer. This is likely
to be a very rare occurrence.
It is not possible
to enter three M codes. In the rare instance that this is required, two
M codes, one of which must be M7, should be entered in IMS or FOSS
and the third M code highlighted in the narrative.
S Criterion
In all cases an
S code is required.
- S1 - No
requirement for medical surveillance.
- S2 - Requires
medical surveillance if the applicant is granted entry to Canada.
S2 requires that
the reason for medical surveillance be specified:
- S 2.02 for inactive
TB.
- S 2.04 for adequately
treated positive syphilis serology.
Note: Some
applicants will be medically inadmissible and yet still be granted entry
to Canada, e.g. M5 where a Temporary Resident Permit is issued. The
S2 coding signals the need for medical surveillance on entry to Canada.
In certain rare circumstances,
such as persons in need of urgent protection, an applicant may have active
infectious TB and will be assessed M4 but still be permitted entry to
Canada. These migrants will be coded D8 S2.01 and M4 and
will require close cooperation with the visa officer to organize safe
transportation and to coordinate public health management on arrival in
Canada.
D Criterion
In all assessments,
a D code will be required.
Note: D1 no longer
means no demand on health or social services. D1 now refers only to
the category of applicant, i.e. not exempt from excessive demand
assessment.
It is important that
visa/immigration officers check the medical profile and narrative screen
in CAIPS in order to identify migrants who require medical surveillance
and applicants who require the issuance of health follow-up handouts.
SUMMARY
- The medical assessment
will include D, S and M coding.
- H T E will be coded
as "1" for all applicants.
- Non-EDE applicants
will be coded D1.
- Specified categories
of applicants (EDE) will be exempt from an excessive demand assessment
and will be assessed as D8 and M7.
- Those EDE applicants
who are assessed as a Danger to Public Health or a Danger to Public
Safety will be coded D8 and M4/7 or D8 and M6/7.
- Visa/immigration
officers will need to review the profile and narratives for all M7 applicants.
The medical validity date must be included in the narrative for EDE
cases.
- It is imperative
that visa office staff manually enter the medical validity date
for EDE applicants into CAIPS to support the CAIPS generation of immigration
documents, e.g. IMM1000/Permanent Resident Card.
- Applicants who
are EDE and who require medical surveillance will be assigned the appropriate
S code and narrative and provided with the appropriate health follow-up
handout.
ANNEX A
KEY HEALTH-RELATED
SECTIONS IN IRPA AND REGULATIONS
IRPA:
A38.(1) A foreign
national is inadmissible on health grounds if their health condition
- is likely
to be a danger to public health;
- is likely
to be a danger to public safety; or
- might reasonably
be expected to cause excessive demand on health or social services.
A38.(2) Paragraph
(1)(c) does not apply in the case of a foreign national who
- has been determined
to be a member of the family class and to be the spouse, common-law
partner or child of a sponsor within the meaning of the regulations;
- has applied
for a permanent resident visa as a Convention refugee or a person
in similar circumstances;
- is a protected
person; or
- is, where
prescribed by the regulations, the spouse, common-law partner, child
or other family member of a foreign national referred to in any of
paragraphs (a) to (c).
IRPA REGULATIONS:
Definitions
R1.(1) The definitions
in this subsection apply in the Act and in these Regulations.
"Excessive
demand" means
- a demand on
health services or social services for which the anticipated costs
would likely exceed average Canadian per capita health services and
social services costs over a period of five consecutive years immediately
following the most recent medical examination required by these Regulations,
unless there is evidence that significant costs are likely to be incurred
beyond that period, in which case the period is no more than 10 consecutive
years; or
- a demand on
health services or social services that would add to existing waiting
lists and would increase the rate of mortality and morbidity in Canada
as a result of the denial or delay in the provision of those services
to Canadian citizens or permanent residents.
"Health services"
means
any health services
for which the majority of the funds are contributed by governments,
including the services of family physicians, medical specialists, nurses,
chiropractors and physiotherapists, laboratory services and the supply
of pharmaceutical or hospital care.
"Social services"
means
any social services,
such as home care, specialized residence and residential services, special
education services, special education services, social and vocational
rehabilitation services, personal support services and the provision
of devices related to those services,
- that are intended
to assist a person in functioning physically, emotionally, socially,
psychologically or vocationally; and
- for which
the majority of the funding, including funding that provides direct
or indirect financial support to an assisted person, is contributed
by governments, either directly or through publicly-funded agencies.
Excessive Demand
R34. Before concluding
whether a foreign national’s health condition might reasonably be expected
to cause excessive demand, an officer who is assessing the foreign national’s
health condition shall consider
- any reports
made by a health practitioner or medical laboratory with respect to
the foreign national; and
- any condition
identified by the medical examination.
Public Health
R31. Before concluding
whether a foreign national’s health condition is likely to be a danger
to public health, an officer who is assessing the foreign national’s health
condition shall consider
- any report made
by a health practitioner or medical laboratory with respect to the foreign
national;
- the communicability
of any disease that the foreign national is affected by or carries,
and
- the impact that
the disease could have on other persons living in Canada.
Conditions
R32. In addition
to the conditions that are imposed on a foreign national who makes an
application as a member of a class, an officer may impose, vary or cancel
the following conditions in respect of any foreign national who is requested
to and must submit to a medical examination under subsection 16(2) of
the Act or section 30 of these Regulations:
- to report at
the specified times and places for medical examination, surveillance
or treatment; and
- to provide proof,
at the specified times and places, of compliance with the conditions
imposed.
Public Safety
R33. Before concluding
whether a foreign national’s health condition is likely to be a danger
to public safety, an officer who is assessing the foreign national’s health
condition shall consider
(a) any reports
made by a health practitioner or medical laboratory with respect to
the foreign national; and
(b) the risk
of a sudden incapacity or of unpredictable or violent behaviour of the
foreign national that would create a danger to the health or safety
of persons living in Canada.
Assessment of
Inadmissibility on Health Grounds
R20. An officer
shall determine that a foreign national is inadmissible on health grounds
if an assessment of their health condition has been made by an officer
who is responsible for the application of sections 29 to 34 and the officer
concluded that the foreign national’s health condition is likely to be
a danger to public health or public safety or might reasonably be expected
to cause excessive demand.
ANNEX C
SUMMARY
OF IMMIGRATION MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FOR USE WITH IRPA
CRITERION
H |
CRITERION
D |
CRITERION
T |
CRITERION
S |
CRITERION
E |
M
STATEMENT |
H1
Not applicable |
D1
Signifies applicant not assessed under Section 38(2). |
T1
Not applicable |
S1
No surveillance required. |
E1
Not applicable |
M1
No health condition identified sufficient to prevent admission for
medical reasons under Section 38(1). |
|
D8
Linked with M7, signifies that the applicant assessed under Section
38(2). |
|
S2
Medical surveillance required. Conditional entry recommended if
granted entry to Canada. |
|
M2
Has a condition for which the degree of risk to public health is
not sufficient to exclude admission under Section 38(1)(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
M3
Has a condition for which the potential demand on health or social
services is not sufficient to exclude admission under Section 38(1)(c).
|
|
|
|
|
|
M4
Has a condition which is likely to be a danger to public health
to such an extent that the applicant is inadmissible under Section
38(1)(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
M5
Has a condition which might reasonably be expected to cause excessive
demand on health or social services to such an extent that the applicant
is inadmissible under Section 38(1)(c). |
|
|
|
|
|
M6
Has a condition which is likely to be a danger to public safety
to such an extent that the applicant is inadmissible under Section
38(1)(b). |
|
|
|
|
|
M7
Linked with D8, signifies that the applicant assessed under Section
38(2). |
|