Public Health Agency of Canada / Agence de santé publique du Canada
Skip all navigation -accesskey z Skip to sidemenu -accesskey x Skip to main menu -accesskey m Skip all navigation -accesskey z
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
PHAC Home Centres Publications Guidelines A-Z Index
Child Health Adult Health Seniors Health Surveillance Health Canada



Volume 20, No.3 - 2000

 [Table of Contents] 

 

Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)

Rate and Cost of Hospitalizations for Asthma in Quebec: An Analysis of 1988/89, 1989/90 and 1994/95 Data

Claudine Laurier, Wendy Kennedy, Jean-Luc Malo, Michèle Paré, Daniel Labbé, André Archambault and André-Pierre Contandriopoulos


Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate recent trends in the frequency and length of stay of hospitalization for asthma in the province of Quebec and to estimate the costs of asthma hospitalizations. Data were extracted for persons hospitalized for 30 days or less with a primary diagnosis of asthma in all Quebec short-stay hospitals during the years 1988/89, 1989/90 and 1994/95. There were 1.76 asthma hospitalizations per 1000 persons in Quebec in 1988/89, down to 1.44 in 1989/90 and up again to 1.75 in 1994/95. There was a small decrease in mean length of stay when the three data years were compared. In all three years, the rate of hospitalization was particularly high among young boys. In 1994/95, more hospitalizations occurred during the fall months. We estimated the total cost for asthma hospitalization that year to be $18 to $21 million.

Key words: asthma; costs; hospitalizations; Quebec

>

Introduction

Asthma is a common disease of both adults and children, causing breathing impairment with consequences dependent on the severity of the disorder. Studies have estimated the population prevalence as 3%1 and 7%2 in the adult population and over 10% in children.3 According to the 1987 Santé Québec survey, the prevalence of asthma, bronchitis and emphysema (as one comprehensive category) was 3.9% in the general Quebec population.4 Santé Québec has published the prevalence by sex (4.1% among women and 3.9% among men) and by age group for some groups: 4.1% among those aged less than 15 years, 3.2% among those 15S24, 4.4% among those 45S64 and 7.1% among those 65 and older.4

Rates of Quebec hospitalizations for asthma increased during the decade from the early 1970s to the early 1980s, by 79% to 1.56 per 1000 among males and by 58% to 1.33 per 1000 among females.5 The early 1980s may have seen a decrease: in 1984/85 there were 9080 hospitalizations for asthma in Quebec, down from 11,726 in 1980/81.6 Over the entire 1980s there was an average increase in the annual rate of hospitalizations of 3.3%.7 In Canada, the number of hospitalizations increased at an average rate of 1.8% per year from 1981 to 1989, and the mean length of stay decreased from 6 to 4.7 days over the same period.8 Hospitalization rates differed across age groups—in 1988 the estimated rate was 5.82 per 1000 among those under 15 years old and 0.66 among those aged 15 to 34.8 Asthma hospitalization was subject to a substantial seasonal influence, the rate peaking in autumn.9,10

The preceding data describe the situation in the 1980s. With the increase in use of inhaled corticosteroids (from 6 per 1000 Saskatchewan inhabitants in 1989 to 20 per 1000 in 199311), reflecting the dissemination of guidelines and recommendations for treatment of asthma, there could be a decrease in the need for hospitalization due to asthma. Such a decrease was seen recently in Sweden.12 Offsetting this expected trend is the increase in the prevalence of asthma that is generally agreed to be taking place.13

Inasmuch as the cost of asthma treatment is important, relatively up-to-date estimates of the cost of hospitalization for asthma—a major component of overall costs—are of interest. The direct costs of asthma in Canada for 1990 were estimated to be $306 million; hospital in-patient care was an estimated $84.4 million, excluding drugs.14

To explore the hypothesized changes in rates of hospitalization and to estimate the cost of this area of asthma treatment, we examined rates of hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of asthma for the Quebec population during three one-year periods: 1988/89, 1989/90 and 1994/95. Rates and average lengths of stay of such hospitalizations were established, and those for 1994/95 were examined according to age, sex and month of admission. The costs associated with the 1994/95 asthma hospitalizations were then estimated.


Methods

This study used the MED-ECHO database for fiscal years 1988/89, 1989/90 and 1994/95 (i.e. from April 1 until March 31 for each year). MED-ECHO is an electronic database that contains detailed hospitalization summaries. The database includes information on the principal diagnosis and up to 16 associated diagnoses, dates of admission and separation, length of stay, ward, major procedures undergone as well as the age and sex of the patient. All hospitalizations with the principal diagnosis of asthma (ICD-9 codes 493.0 to 493.9) were retrieved for the relevant years. As MED-ECHO annual files are organized according to date of separation, the hospitalizations analyzed in this study included those in which the patient was admitted during the previous period but discharged in the period of study. On the other hand, hospitalizations for patients admitted during the period of study but discharged in the subsequent period were not included. Less than 1% of retrieved hospitalizations were in long-stay hospitals or were for a period of greater than 30 days. These long-stay hospitalizations were excluded from the analysis, as they were likely to be related to conditions other than simple asthma.

Population data represented the population eligible for the Health Insurance Program on July 1st of the respective year (1989, 1990 and 1995) and was lower by about 86,000 than the total estimated population of roughly 7 million.15 It should be noted that MED-ECHO reports the number of hospitalizations and not the number of people hospitalized in any given period. The rates presented here must be interpreted accordingly.

Rate of hospitalization per 1000 and length of stay were estimated by age group and sex for the three one-year periods. Age (in years) was grouped as follows: less than 1, 1S4, 5S9, 10S14, 15S19, 20S39, 40S64, 65S74, and 75 and older. The 1994/95 hospitalization rates were also analyzed by month of admission. Differences in the average length of stay among patients according to the month of admission, age group and sex were tested for significance using parametric or non-parametric tests (t-test, analysis of variance [ANOVA] or Kruskall-Wallis). A two-way ANOVA was performed for age and sex.

The cost of asthma hospitalization was estimated by means of two methods. The first used the 1994/95 financial data for all short-stay hospitals (excluding psychiatric hospitals). A per diem specific to the hospital ward was calculated, which included nursing care, pharmacy, laboratory, “hotel,” administration and maintenance costs; it excluded capital cost investment and physician reimbursement. The recorded length of stay was multiplied by the per diem.

The second approach used an index reflecting the relative use of resources (NIRRU) for each hospitalization classified according to its All-Patient Refined Diagnostic-Related Group (APR-DRG).16 These APR-DRGs constitute 1530 groups of clinically homogeneous patients requiring an equivalent level of resources. They are based on diagnosis, severity and probability of poor outcome. Among other changes to the previous versions of the DRG classifications, the APR-DRG system has incorporated certain specific pediatric DRGs. For each APR-DRG, a NIRRU was created.

The NIRRU was based on costs per APR-DRG for typical patients established in Maryland in 1994. The cost for each APR-DRG was divided by the mean cost for all hospitalizations to obtain a relative weight, where 1.00 corresponded to the mean. This index was then adjusted to take into account the differences in lengths of stay between Maryland and Quebec (see Appendix). A NIRRU was calculated for each asthma hospitalization and was applied to the average cost of hospitalizations in the province of Quebec for 1994 to establish a cost per asthma hospitalization.

Total and average costs for all asthma hospitalizations were estimated using both methods, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for average costs per NIRRU-adjusted asthma hospitalization.


Results

Hospitalization Rates for Asthma

From 1989 to 1995, the population of Quebec eligible for health benefits increased by 4.1%, from 6.91 million to 7.19 million. The rate of the total number of hospitalizations less than 30 days (for any reason) at the end of that period was 14.8% higher than at the beginning, increasing from 142 per 1000 in 1988/89 to 163 per 1000 in 1994/95. The proportion of Quebec hospitalizations associated with asthma as the principal diagnosis was 1.1% in 1994/95, slightly lower than in 1988/89 (1.2%). The rate of hospitalization with asthma as the principal diagnosis was 1.76 per 1000 in 1988/89, fell to 1.44 in 1989/90 and rose to 1.75 in 1994/95 (Table 1).

Rates were estimated at 1.85 per 1000 among men and 1.67 per 1000 among women in 1988/89, falling to 1.79 and 1.71 per 1000, respectively, in 1994/95 (Table 1).

 

 


TABLE 1

Quebec hospitalizations (number and rate per 1000 population) with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS #30 days) and mean length of stay (LOS), 1988/89, 1989/90 and 1994/95

Sex and age group

1988/89

1989/90

1994/95

n

Rate

Mean LOS

LOS 95% CI

n

Rate

Mean LOS

LOS 95% CI

n

Rate

Mean LOS

LOS 95% CI

TOTAL

12,166

1.76

4.27

4.20–4.34

10,217

1.44

4.13

4.05–4.21

12,604

1.75

3.75

3.69–3.81

Males

6,328

1.85

3.75

3.67–3.83

5,179

1.48

3.47

3.38–3.56

6,335

1.79

3.19

3.12–3.26

Females

5,838

1.67

4.83

4.72–4.94

5,038

1.41

4.81

4.68–4.94

6,269

1.71

4.31

4.21–4.41

<1

584

6.20

4.41

4.12–4.70

521

5.48

3.98

3.70–4.26

1,121

12.30

3.54

3.39–3.69

1–4

3,475

12.24

3.05

2.97–3.13

4,283

12.20

2.63

2.57–2.69

4,315

11.08

2.38

2.33–2.43

5–9

1,248

4.01

3.03

2.91–3.15

1,917

4.10

2.63

2.55–2.71

1,341

3.01

2.33

2.25–2.41

10–14

799

2.27

3.30

3.14–3.46

1,062

2.19

2.94

2.83–3.05

859

1.79

2.83

2.70–2.96

15–19

461

1.06

3.51

3.28–3.74

494

1.08

3.18

2.95–3.41

582

1.22

2.98

2.78–3.18

20–39

1,098

0.48

4.37

4.17–4.57

1,197

0.61

4.43

4.23–4.63

1,310

0.57

4.01

3.83–4.19

40–64

1,507

0.88

6.77

6.52–7.02

1,658

0.83

6.60

6.35–6.85

1,710

0.79

5.72

5.50–5.94

65–74

617

1.42

8.06

7.60–8.52

617

1.34

8.44

7.98–8.90

739

1.45

7.36

6.96–7.76

75+

428

1.56

9.81

9.18–10.44

417

1.42

8.56

8.00–9.12

626

1.91

8.31

7.85–8.77


   

The hospitalization rate for children less than 1 year old in 1994/95 was twice as high as in 1988/89 or 1989/90. In the 1S4 age group, it remained relatively the same but slightly lower than the 1988/89 figure.

Figure 1 shows that hospitalization rates for asthma in 1994/95 were highest among male infants under the age of 1 year, and high among boys aged 1S4. As well, boys under 5 were hospitalized at a rate roughly twice that of their female counterparts. In the age groups of 10 years and older, however, the rates among women were higher, and females aged 20S39 were hospitalized at roughly twice the rate of their male counterparts.


FIGURE 1

Rates of Quebec hospitalizations with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS <=30 days), by age and sex, 1994/95

Rates of Quebec hospitalizations with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS <=30 days), by age and sex, 1994/95


FIGURE 2

Quebec hospitalization rates with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS <=30 days) and average length of stay, by month, 1994/95

Quebec hospitalization rates with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS <=30 days) and average length of stay, by month, 1994/95

 


   

For 1994/95, the hospitalization rates for asthma were higher in the autumn and winter months (from September to December) and lower in the summer months (from May to August), particularly in the holiday months of July and August (Figure 2).


Length of Hospital Stay

The average length of stay for asthma hospitalizations decreased from one study period to another. Mean lengths of stay were significantly longer for women than men in all three periods. Mean length of stay for men decreased from 1988/89 to 1994/95. It stayed roughly the same for women in 1988/89 and 1989/90, but was lower in 1994/95.

Mean length of stay also varied significantly with respect to age group (p < 0.01, chi-squared = 2874, Kruskall-Wallis). Data for all three periods showed a consistent pattern of relatively long duration for the youngest group (less than 1 year), declining to the shortest mean duration in the 5S9 age group, then increasing up to the longest stay in the 75+ age group (Table 1).

The two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction of age and sex on mean length of stay in 1994/95 (p < 0.001, F = 21). Mean lengths of stay and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for age group and sex appear in Table 2. For boys and girls under age 5, mean lengths of stay appeared similar. Differences between men and women were significant in three age groups (5-9, 10-14 and 40-64).

The average length of stay in 1994/95 also varied significantly according to month of admission (Figure 2), being shorter for those admitted during the fall months (p < 0.01, chi-squared = 221, Kruskall-Wallis).

 

 


TABLE 2

Quebec hospitalizations with asthma as principal
diagnosis (LOS <=30 days) and mean length of stay (LOS),
by age and sex, 1994/95

Age group

Hospital separations: MALES

Hospital separations: FEMALES

n

Mean
LOS
(days)

LOS 95%
CI

n

Mean
LOS
(days)

LOS 95%
CI

<1

783

3.57

3.38–3.74

338

3.49

3.21–3.77

1–4

2,824

2.40

2.33–2.47

1,491

2.36

2.28–2.44

5–9

766

2.23

2.13–2.33

575

2.46

2.34–2.58

10–14

410

2.55

2.39–2.71

449

3.09

2.88–3.29

15–19

188

2.72

2.43–3.01

394

3.10

2.83–3.37

20–39

443

3.88

3.59–4.16

867

4.08

3.85–4.31

40–64

495

5.10

4.73–5.47

1,215

5.97

5.71–6.24

65–74

239

6.83

6.13–7.54

500

7.62

7.13–8.10

75+

186

7.94

7.05–8.82

440

8.48

7.93–9.02

TOTAL

6,335

3.19

3.12–3.26

6,269

4.31

4.21–4.41


   

Cost of Hospitalizations for Asthma

The results of the cost estimation for asthma hospitalizations in Quebec for the year 1994/95 are presented in Table 3. For the first method of calculation, using the per diem for short-stay hospitals ($379),17 the average 1994/95 cost per stay was approximately $1400 and the total cost was $17.9 million.

A NIRRU was estimated for all 1994/95 short-stay asthma hospitalizations except 54 (0.4%). The average NIRRU for all the asthma hospitalizations was 0.6 (±0.003), and this varied according to the ward in which the patient was treated (Table 3). The average cost per stay was $1676 (95% CI = 1661S1692). Of the total cost of $21.0 million, the greatest proportion was accounted for by the Pediatrics ward ($9.9 million). The NIRRU-adjusted cost per stay was lowest in Allergy ($1397) and Pediatrics ($1,413) wards, where the average lengths of stay were shortest, and highest in Internal Medicine ($2150) and Other ($2348) wards, where the average lengths of stay were highest.

 

 


TABLE 3

Costs of Quebec hospitalizations with asthma as principal diagnosis (LOS <=30 days),
by hospital ward and calculation method, 1994/95

Hospital ward

Hospital separations

Costs: METHOD Aa

n

% of total

Mean LOS

TOTAL DAYS

Cost per day

Cost per stay

TOTAL COST

Allergy

439

3.5

2.19

961

$379

$831

$364,817

Internal medicine

587

4.7

6.05

3,551

$379

$2,296

$1,347,595

Pneumology

1,862

14.8

5.70

10,613

$379

$2,163

$4,027,361

Pediatrics

7,039

55.8

2.60

18,301

$379

$987

$6,944,649

Medicine

2,475

19.6

5.08

12,573

$379

$1,928

$4,770,951

Other

202

1.6

6.19

1,250

$379

$2,349

$474,469

TOTAL

12,604

100.0

3.75

47,251

$379

$1,423

$17,929,842

Hospital ward

Hospital separations

Costs: METHOD Ba

nb

% of total

Mean NIRRU

NIRRU 95% CI

Cost per stay

95% CI

TOTAL COST

Allergy

439

3.5

0.497

0.484–0.511

$1,397

$1,358–1,436

$613,182

Internal medicine

580

4.6

0.766

0.729–0.803

$2,150

$2,047–2,253

$1,247,046

Pneumology

1,849

14.7

0.725

0.709–0.741

$2,037

$1,992–2,081

$3,765,525

Pediatrics

7,037

56.1

0.503

0.499–0.508

$1,413

$1,400–1,425

$9,941,170

Medicine

2,445

19.5

0.729

0.712–0.745

$2,046

$2,000–2,091

$5,001,394

Other

200

1.6

0.836

0.763–0.909

$2,348

$2,143–2,553

$469,552

TOTAL

12,550

100.0

0.597

0.592–0.603

$1,676

$1,661–1,692

$21,037,893

a Method A used a per diem multiplied by the number of days per hospitalization in each ward.
Method B used the NIRRU (index of relative resource use) calculated for each hospitalization.

b There were 54 hospitalizations for which the NIRRU could not be attributed.

Note: Totals may differ because of rounding.


   

Discussion

Earlier studies found an increase in the hospitalization rate for asthma in Quebec from the early 1970s to the early 1980s.5 The hospitalization increases during that period for all of Canada were greatest in persons under the age of 15.5 From 1981 to 1988, the overall Canadian age-standardized rate of hospitalizations rose by roughly 40%. Although the rate in Quebec was lower than the national average, the increase was relatively high, at 70% and 77% for those under 15 and ages 15-35, respectively.8

Our data show that asthma hospitalization rates were lower in 1989/90 than in 1988/89. As well, mean length of stay was shorter in 1989/90 than in 1988/89. In 1994/95, a return to the 1988/89 level of asthma hospitalization rate was seen; however, the mean length of stay was shorter than in the preceding period. The decrease in mean length of stay is consistent with that reported elsewhere for Canada.18

Our analysis has confirmed the differences according to age and sex that have been found in previous studies.1,8 Longer mean hospital stays were associated with individuals less than 1 year old and those over 75. There was an interaction of the variables of age and sex with respect to length of hospital stay: mean stays were relatively similar until the age of 5, and after that the length of stay was often longer for girls and women. This could be explained by an association between average length of hospital stay and the presence of comorbid conditions, more frequent in older women. Indeed, hospitalizations with a secondary diagnosis were, on average, of longer duration (4.3 days, 95% CI = 4.17–4.34) than those without (2.6 days, 95% CI = 2.52–2.65).

As documented previously,9,10 most asthma hospitalizations occurred in the fall and the fewest, in the summer. The reduced hospitalization rate in the summer was possibly partially due to holidays and hospital bed closures associated with health care staff reductions. The relatively high numbers in the fall may be associated with increased viral infections occurring near the beginning of the school year19 and ragweed allergy season (from mid-August until the end of September),20 the asthmatic individual tolerating the reaction for a certain length of time until hospital admission was necessary. An additional cause could be the increased time spent indoors during these fall months, with increased exposure to indoor allergens such as mites and domestic animals.

This seasonal peak does not appear to be an artifact of including patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease misdiagnosed as asthma (whose problems may increase in the fall months) because the increase, when analyzed by age group, seemed to be accounted for mostly by children under the age of 10. There was a small rise in the number of admissions in the 40-64-year-old group in September and October, but not in those aged 65 and over (data not shown).

Length of hospital stay was also associated with month of admission, in that the shortest stay was associated with fall admission and the longest with winter admission. Although at first glance this could reflect the availability of hospital beds, since the length of stay appeared to be inversely related to the number of admissions, it was probably more likely due to the increased numbers of hospitalizations of young children during the fall, with their concomitant shorter average stays.

The NIRRU-adjusted cost estimate was higher than that calculated from the average hospitalization cost. Most likely this was due to the ability of the NIRRU to account for the higher cost of days at the beginning of a hospitalization. Asthma hospitalizations are shorter, on average, than overall hospitalizations in Quebec, by almost 50%. Economic evaluations that apply average costs per hospital day could be underestimating the true cost.

The NIRRU index was based upon costs in Maryland, US, and this could limit its usefulness. It is assumed that although the absolute costs per APR-DRG could differ between Maryland and Quebec, the relative costs of one group compared with another should be the same. The adjustments for the Quebec situation did take into consideration differences in the average length of stay between Maryland and Quebec (Quebec hospital stays are normally longer) and the fact that the end of a hospital stay was less resource-intensive than the beginning. There are limitations, however, in using an index based on a different system: we cannot account for structural differences in costs, such as for nursing care and equipment, nor do we have information on the differences between the US and Canada in terms of the severity of the condition of patients admitted to hospital. Even with these limitations, the NIRRU does give us some advantages over a simple per diem, which does not account for differences in resource-intensity during the stay or for differences in severity of illness among patients.

Assuming that Quebec’s hospitalizations represent 21% of those for Canada (based on the rate reported for 1989), the estimate by Krahn et al.14 for 1990, inflated at 3% per year (or $20 million), is very similar to the estimate we have reached in this study. Their study used a more macro approach, taking the proportion of total Canadian hospital days accounted for by patients with asthma and multiplying this by the aggregate cost data for all Canadian public hospitals. Our research study involved a micro approach, using the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services reported cost and length of stay by service and ward, in the majority of cases adjusted specifically for the ward in which the patient was treated. Nonetheless, the current study may have left some asthma hospitalization costs unaccounted for, as we reviewed only short-term hospital centres and only hospitalizations for a period of 30 days or less. However, those hospitalizations not included accounted for less than 1% of the total asthma hospitalizations for 1994/95.


Conclusion

This study shows similar overall rates of hospitalization in 1988/89 and 1994/95, but with an important rise in the rates among very young children. There were decreases in rates in very few age groups. A small decrease in mean length of stay was seen.

Many of the trends and variations in asthma hospital use found in this study have been seen previously and their causes discussed. Certainly, in analyses of institutional database information it is difficult to determine the causes of changing patterns of use. However, even if the increases in rates of hospitalization seen in very young children could be attributed in part to a change in physician practice or an increase in the use of asthma diagnosis, the rate has doubled since the beginning of the decade and should signal an alarm that justifies further investigation.

A one-year cost of $18–21 million may seem high for asthma hospital costs, but it is most likely a considerable underestimation of the true hospital cost because emergency department visits and physician costs were not included in the analysis.


Acknowledgements

Partial funding of this study was provided by Glaxo Canada Inc. Dr Laurier holds the Hoechst Marion Roussel Chair on Use of Medications: Policy and Outcomes at the University of Montreal.


References

    1. Evans III R, Mullally DI, Wilson RW, Gergen PJ, Rosenberg HM, Grauman JS, et al. National trends in the morbidity and mortality of asthma in the US. Prevalence, hospitalization and death from asthma over two decades: 1965S1984. Chest 1987;91(Suppl): 65SS73S.

    2. Dodge RR, Burrows B. The prevalence and incidence of asthma and asthma-like symptoms in a general population sample. Am Rev Respir Dis1980;122:567S75.

    3. Mak H, Johnston P, Abbey H, Talamo RC. Prevalence of asthma and health service utilization of asthmatic children in an inner city. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982;70:367S72.

    4. Émond A, Guyon L, Camirand F, Chenard L, Pineault R, Robitaille Y. Et la santé, ça va? Tome 1, Rapport de l’enquête Santé Québec 1987. Quebec: Publications du Québec, 1988.

    5. Mao Y, Semenciw R, Morrison H, MacWilliam L, Davies J, Wigle D. Increased rates of illness and death from asthma in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 1987;137:620S4.

    6. Boulet L, Milot J, Beaupré A. Mortalité associée à l’asthme au Québec de 1975 à 1985. Union Médicale du Canada 1989;118:150S7.

    7. Wilkins K. Fact sheet: asthma (ICD-9 493). Chronic Dis Can 1993;14(2):50.

    8. Wilkins K, Y Mao. Trends in rates of admission to hospital and death from asthma among children and young adults in Canada during the 1980s. Can Med Assoc J 1993;148:185S90.

    9. Mao Y, Semenciw R, Morrison H, Wigle DT. Seasonality in epidemics of asthma mortality and hospital admission rates, Ontario, 1979S86. Can J Public Health 1990;81:226S8.

    10. Osborne ML, Vollmer WM, Buist AS. Periodicity of asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis in a northwest health maintenance organization. Chest 1996;110:1458S62.

    11. Habbick B, Baker MJ, McNutt M, Cockcroft DW. Recent trends in the use of inhaled B2-adrenergic agonists and inhaled corticosteroids in Saskatchewan. Can Med Assoc J 1995;153:1437S43.

    12. Gerdtham U-G, Hertzman P, Johsson B, Boman G. Impact of inhaled corticosteroids on acute asthma hospitalization in Sweden. Med Care 1996;34:1188S98.

    13. Grossman J. One airway, one disease. Chest 1997;111(2 Suppl):11SS16S.

    14. Krahn M, Berka C, Langlois P, Detsky AS. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in Canada, 1990. Can Med Assoc J 1996;154:821S31.

    15. Régie de l’Assurance maladie du Québec. Statistiques annuelles. Quebec: Régie de l’Assurance maladie du Québec, 1994.

    16. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. Évaluation de la performance économique globale des centres hospitaliers de soins généraux et spécialisés, volet “clientèle hospitalisée” — résultats 1994-1995. Government of Quebec, 1996.

    17. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, province de Québec. Direction générale de l’administration et des immobilisations [unpublished data]. Quebec, Canada.

    18. Statistics Canada. Hospital statistics: preliminary annual report, 1994S95. Health Rep 1996;8(1):48.

    19. Johnston SL, Pattemore PK, Sanderson G, Smith S, Campbell MJ, Josephs LK, et al. The relationship between upper respiratory infections and hospital admissions for asthma: a time-trend analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154(3 Pt 1):654S60.

    20. Bassett IJ. Surveys of air-borne ragweed pollen in Canada with particular reference to sites in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 1959;39:491S7.


Author References

Claudine Laurier, Faculté de pharmacie and Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec

Wendy Kennedy and André-Pierre Contandriopoulos, Administration de Santé and Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec

Jean-Luc Malo, Faculté de médecine, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec

Michèle Paré, Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec

Daniel Labbé, Direction générale de la planification et de l’évaluation, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec, Quebec

André Archambault, Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec

Correspondence: Claudine Laurier, Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centreville, Montréal (Québec) H3C 3J7

[Previous][Table of Contents] [Next]


APPENDIX

Example of the calculation of the NIRRU and adjustment for length of stay (LOS)

NIRRUQ = NIRRUM + (NET LOSQ-M X NIRRUM ÷ LOSM X RatioFC)

where

NIRRUQ = Quebec cost index for the APR-DRG
NIRRUM = Maryland cost index for the APR-DRG
NET LOSQ-M = Difference between Quebec and Maryland of average length of stay for the APR-DRG
LOSM = Average length of stay for the APR-DRG in Maryland
RatioFC = Ratio of fixed daily costs to average daily costs for the APR-DRG in Maryland

To calculate the NIRRU for an APR-DRG that, in Maryland, was given an index of 2.5 per case, had an average stay of 5 days and a fixed-cost ratio of 60%,
NIRRUQ = 2.5 + ((7-5) X 2.5 ÷ 5 X 0.6) = 3.1
The last step is to normalize all the DRGs thus calculated to ensure that the total of the weighted cases equals the real total.
This calculation is applied to all except the atypical cases. Atypical cases are long-stay patients occupying short-stay beds, patients who died, patients discharged without authorization, transfers, home-care patients, patients admitted and discharged the same day, and patients whose stay exceeded a certain maximum (calculated to exclude about 3% of cases). NIRRUs for atypical cases are calculated not on the basis of the average DRG but on their actual average stay in proportion to the average Quebec stay for their DRG. An additional adjustment is also made to the NIRRU for those who have died or been transferred according to the difference in the use of resources as a function of the date of death or transfer.

Last Updated: 2002-10-20 Top