Home
Français
Introduction
History
Annual Index
Author &
Subject
Credits
Contact |
Realism,
Surrealism and Celebration:
The Paintings of Alex Colville in the
Collection of the National Gallery of Canada
by Patrick A. E.
Hutchings
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy
University of Western
Australia
Pages 1 | 2
| 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8 |
9 | 10
Notes
30 European parallels: Helen J. Dow has recorded Colville's
affinity with and admiration for Poussin in her article 'The Magic
Realism of Alex Colville. (see Bibliography), and there is an
obvious if not ultimately instructive affinity between Colville and
the Pre-Raphaelites (the painter himself scotched any suggestion of
borrowings). But there is another parallel which is worth following
up, putting aside as extremely remote indeed all suggestions of
influence.
Colville's technique suggests ultimate comparisons with David, and
occasionally with the hard edges of Ingres, But the revolutionary
heroics of David have long since come to rest in the égalitarian
society that he might have wanted, and would no doubt have found
extraordinarily boring. Not surprisingly perhaps we find a Danish
pupil of David exploiting his heroic line for democratic ends in the
master's own lifetime. C. W. Eckersberg's The Eldest Daughters of
M. L. Nathanson, Esq. (Copenhagen, Royal Museum of Fine Arts;
reproduced in colour in The Studio, Vol. 138, July-December
1949, p.140) is monumental and hard in David's way, but absolutely
unheroic and domestic: it shows us the two girls and a parrot in a
cage in a comfortable Turkey-carpeted room, an irreducibly bourgeois
subject, but rendered so that the gestures of ordinary life
become as monumentally significant as the grands gestes of
David's turbulent sitters. Eckersberg's Nude Before a Mirror (oil,
Collection Hirschprung, reproduced in Peinture et Sculpture au
Danemark, Vagn Poulsen, Copenhagen, n. d., Institut danois des
Relations culturelles, p. 48) is a kind of democratized David or
Ingres figure, a middle-class woman in a domestic interior, with no
pretensions to classical nudity, who nevertheless achieves the calm
and absolute repose of a mythological creature.
Danish portraiture and domestic painting had been, as we see
in Jens Juel's Portrait d'une jeune mère et son fils (c. 1802)
(Poulsen, p. 43), superbly intimate, but elegant in an
aristocratic way. Eckersberg replaces the aristocratic grace with
his own peculiar prosaic monumentality, and it is difficult to avoid
the temptation to label him by hindsight a social-democratic
painter. One is tempted to see him as foreshadowing the sober égalitarianism
which Denmark was to adopt as its social principle.
Certainly there is an affinity between this prosaicization of
David and Colville's monumentalization of the prosaic: the
same, or closely analogous, motives seem to be at work in both. (See
also Niels Th. Mortensen, Dansk Billedkunst, Odense,
Skandinvisk Bogforlag, 1964.)
It is very curious that David's Canadian disciple George
Theodore Berthon should have failed to appreciate the radical
classicism of his master's line and spirit (see Robert H. Hubbard, An
Anthology of Canadian Art, Toronto, Oxford University Press,
1960, pp. 14-15). Berthon's The Three Robinson Sisters is
closer to Wintehalter than to David, and what one would have
expected to be a most fruitful influence peters out in, 'a
sentimental sweetness which reminds us of the contemporary fashion
plate' (Hubbard). (Hubbard, op. cit. pl. 41; also, plate at p. 19,
The
Development of Painting in Canada / Le Développement de la Peinture
au Canada 1665-1945, Toronto, The Ryerson Press, 1945.)
31 Within the North American school of magic realism, Colville has
his own particular place; but if we look beyond the North American
tradition, his strongest affinities are perhaps with the Italian
School of Pittura Metafisica: see Werner Haftmann's comment, 'In
Pittura Metafisica the Italian painters found a means of expressing the
sense of the mystery concealed in the pure
essence of things...' and his phrase a little later,
'...the initial shock gave way to a quiet sense of fraternity
with things' (compare particularly Felice Casorati's Le
Studio, 1935; and cross refer the plate of Niles Spencer's The
Green Table, 1930, in Goodrich and Baur, American Art of Our Century,
p. 82). Colville's feeling is fraternal, and socialized:
he feels for man, and for the things that are part of man's
life.
Reference: Werner Haftman, Painting in the Twentieth Century, London,
Lund Humphries, 1960, Vol. II, pp. 248 and 258; cf. also pp. 284ff.
(Italics mine).
32 There is an expressionist, allegorist anguish in Tooker's work
which cannot be detected in Colville's: we find this not only in his
famous painting of The Subway, 1950, with its terrifying
cage-forms (a perfect transcript of claustrophobia) and uncanny
repetitions of the one figure, but equally in The Red Carpet 1954,
with its tremendous psychological tension, a tension that belies the
silken smoothness of the composition. The calm profiles of two of
the girls are set off against the staring-eyed obsession of the
third, but the two themselves are alike even to bet wins; this
strikes us suddenly as an almost clinical but absolutely symbolical
portrait-group of hysteria and schizophrenia.
Tooker's medium however is similar to Colville's. egg tempera; and
they handle it with strictly comparable precision.
Vickery, though he can in a painting like The Labyrinth. 1951
(plate in Goodrich and Baur, American Art of Our Century, p.145)
be quite explicitly surrealist and allegorical, does sometimes come
closer to Colville's absolute calm and rejection of anguish: see Conversation
1955 (cf. plates of Tooker and Vickery in The New Decade, 35
American Painters and Sculptors. ed. John J. Baur, N. Y.,
Macmillan for the Whitney Museum, 1955, pp. 87-91 ).
33 Much of Perlin's work has the hyper-realist finish which so
easily invites the surrealist label, and it shows a curious
intensity of vision. one different, equally, from Magritte's and
Colville's. But like Colville - and unlike Alton Pickens, for
example - Perlin eschews both menace and mannerism. His The Shore 1953,
though more ideally real, and more hallucinatory perhaps than
Colville, has a similar feeling of wonder with out terror, of
reality respected but no 1 feared. See: The New Decade, ed.
John I. H. Baur, pp. 62-64, 65-67.
34 John W. McCoubrey in his American Tradition in Painting (N.Y.,
Braziller, 1963, p. 48) gives an interpretation of the intention or
intentionality of the work of Scheeler, Demuth and Hopper which
would oppose it diametrically to the intentionality of Colville's
work, and he concludes:
'...in these twentieth-century paintings, the modern world is
less celebrated than exorcised. (italics mine). If this
interpretation is correct, and it may be though it is at least
questionable on the face of it. then any similarity between these
Americans and Colville would be restricted sharply to matters of
technique alone, for Colville is no exorcist.
A less extreme interpretation of the 'Precisionists' can be found in
American Art of Our Century by Lloyd Goodrich and John 1. H.
Baur (N.Y.. Fdk. A. Praeger for the Whitney Museum, 1961. pp. 50
ff).
Next Page | Notes
35 to 37
1 | 2
| 3 | 4 |
5 | 6
| 7 | 8 |
9 | 10
Top of this page
Home
| Français | Introduction
| History
Annual
Index | Author
& Subject | Credits | Contact
This digital collection
was produced under contract to Canada's Digital Collections program,
Industry Canada.
"Digital
Collections Program, Copyright
© National Gallery of
Canada 2001"
|