Environment Science and Technology Language Culture Home
   


Environmental Decision-Making

 

Program Area

This activity is designed for the Grade 9 Self and Society program and the Canadian History program. It has been designed to fit into the Change and Systems Thinking components of the Self and Society program. It could also be used in the Citizenship unit of the Canadian History course. The activity deals with students evaluating their own values and beliefs in making a decision related to complicated interactions among social, economic and environmental problems. Students will make these decisions in relation to situations and decisions encountered by other individuals in the same circumstances.

Learning Outcomes

Teaching, learning and evaluation will focus on the student's ability to:

  • Actively participate in group problem solving and decision-making to discuss and resolve environmental dilemmas;
  • Appreciate how the needs of different peoples have affected their responses to the fragility of the environment;
  • Predict and evaluate possible futures based on supportable decisions.

Classroom Development

  1. Divide the class into 5 groups and assign each group an environmental dilemma.
  2. Each group completes its Group Environmental Decision-Making Organizer Sheet and prepares to present its findings to the class.
  3. Each group reads the dilemma aloud to the class and presents its responses with supporting arguments.
  4. Facilitate a class discussion of each dilemma and its results.
  5. Based on a class discussion, develop a class consensus for each dilemma.

N.B. Questions useful for facilitating discussion:

  • What factors influenced their decision?
  • Would they have made the same decision if they were personally involved?
  • Can they defend their decisions?
  • What factors made it difficult to reach a decision?

Background Information

These dilemmas were chosen from the Canadian Red Cross Society's, The Dilemma Book. This book provides numerous examples of similar situation in social and development issues, as well as providing an approach to analyzing and discussing sensitive issues. The book Earthrights, contains background information on environment and development issues and methods of resolving conflicts.

Timing

One to two periods (50 min each) are required to resolve and discuss the dilemmas, depending on the amount of time allocated to resolve the issues before class discussion. Expect 20-30 min to read, discuss and resolve the dilemmas in groups and 5-10 min to present and discuss each group's responses. The remaining class time can be devoted to the teacher facilitated class discussion/debriefing.

Resources

Canadian Red Cross Society. The Dilemma Book. Saint John: The Canadian Red Cross Society, 1989.

Greig, Sue, Graham Pike and David Selby. Earthrights: Education As If The Planet Really Mattered. London: Kogan Page/World Wildlife Fund, 1989. Cross-curricular Links This activity integrates reading, writing, listening and speaking skill inherent in the Languages program.

 

Dilemma 1

A Canadian mining company Multinational Mines Inc., has closed down, putting 2500 people out of work and destroying the economy of the town which depended on the mine, the miners and their families. The company says new government anti-pollution laws make it impossible to make a reasonable margin of profit and, as a result, it is putting everything into the operation in Central America where government interference is not a problem.

Dilemma 2

Jane is a pig farmer who has been farming for fifty years in Durning County. Recently a subdivision was built near her farm to house people wanting to live in a country setting but close to the city where they work. The neighbours say the runoff from the farmer's barn is polluting their wells and the smell from the pigs is making life miserable for the three hundred residents. Jane claims the pigs are her livelihood and she was there first. The neighbours take her to court and the court rules in favour of her neighbours.

Dilemma 3

John is hired to work as a clerk typist at the nuclear power plant in his area. As a condition of employment, he must sign an oath of secrecy. John has been following a current debate in the press about the dangers of nuclear plants. One day he sees confidential files that indicate there have been five incidents at the plant in the last four years that posed a serious threat to the community, but were never made public. John's supervisor says the public was never in danger and assures him that everything is under control. John leaks the documents to the press.

Dilemma 4

Anne is an investigative journalist who learns that the source of pollution affecting the drinking water in the town of Merryville, and making people sick, is caused by the local refinery. The same company that owns the refinery owns the paper where Anne works. Although her facts are well documented, the editor refuses to print the story, saying she doesn't have enough proof. Anne believes her job will be in jeopardy if she persists, and drops the story.

Dilemma 5

Jennifer graduates from a business program at her local high school and sends out resumes to forty businesses. After several interviews, she is offered employment by two companies.

Company A is a small Canadian company which manufactures quality leather boots, but their sales are only fair. Company B is a wealthy and secure international corporation that grows and markets coffee all over the world. But it is widely known that the company is a polluter and pays poverty wages to the peasant coffee growers. Children begin working at six years of age, working an eleven hour day at two cents an hour. The company offers Jennifer a 20% higher salary than Company A and good prospects for advancement.

Jennifer accepts the job with Company B.

 

Group Organizer Sheet

Dilemma Number:

  1. What are the facts and issues in the dilemma?

  2. Do you agree or disagree with the decision taken? Provide a supporting argument for your choice.

  3. What factors must influenced your decision?

  4. What trade-offs did you have to make in arriving at your decision?

  5. What are some alternative solutions to this dilemma?