Government of Canada, Privy Council Office
Francais Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New Site Map Reference Works Other PCO Sites Home
Subscribe
Archives - Press Room

Archives - Press Room


MINISTER STÉPHANE DION TABLES A NEW
RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT PROPOSED BY QUÉBEC'S
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY


OTTAWA, ONTARIO, October 1, 1997 – The President of the Privy Council and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, the Honourable Stéphane Dion, tabled a resolution in the House of Commons to amend section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867 and announced that the resolution would be referred to a special joint committee to report to Parliament in the coming weeks.

Minister Dion tabled an identical motion on April 22, but the election call prevented a committee from being struck at that time to study this constitutional amendment.

"As I have indicated on several occasions, the Government of Canada supports the proposed amendment because it is a good thing for the citizens affected by it and because it enjoys a reasonable degree of support from those citizens", the Minister stated.

Mr. Dion noted that even though the Canadian government was able to observe a consensus surrounding this proposal in recent months, including for the constitutional amendment, respect for democratic traditions made it necessary to strike such a committee. The committee will thus enable interested citizens, experts and groups to make their voices heard.

Noting that Quebec society has become secularized and considerably diversified with the arrival of newcomers, the Minister stressed that there was a broad consensus within Quebec society on the need to reorganize school structures along linguistic, rather than denominational, lines. Mr. Dion pointed out, however, that "the Quebec government is not seeking to exclude any reference to religion in education, but rather to secularize the administrative structures. Many Quebecers are attached to religious instruction, and the Quebec government has taken account of that."

The Minister added that, "section 520 of the Education Act, as amended by section 36 and by the schedule of the Act to amend the Education Act, authorizes schools that so desire to retain their denominational orientation. Furthermore, the right to religious instruction is still guaranteed under section 41 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, a document that has quasi-constitutional status according to the Supreme Court of Canada."

Minister Dion also stated that the proposed constitutional amendment in no way went against the interests of the Anglophone community, and that "section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms will continue to provide strong constitutional guarantees to Quebec Anglophones." "In addition," Mr. Dion noted, " the establishment of linguistic school boards will allow the Anglophone community to consolidate its school population and thus to establish a more solid foundation for its rights under section 23."

Urging his colleagues in the House to support the amendment, the Minister stated, "the government of which I am a member has reiterated on a number of occasions that any constitutional amendment must be the subject of a reasonable consensus within the minorities affected. I am pleased to note that that requirement is met in this case." "The Government of Canada solemnly affirms that the same requirement would be indispensable in the event that another province called for an amendment with respect to guarantees for minorities within its territory," Minister Dion concluded.

-30-

Enclosure: Full text of the statement by Minister Dion
For information: André Lamarre
Press Secretary
(613) 943-1838

 

STATEMENT BY MINISTER DION
ON THE AMENDMENT OF
SECTION 93 (EDUCATION) OF THE
CONSTITUTION ACT, 1867


Introduction


Mr. Speaker,

On April 15, 1997, the Quebec National Assembly voted unanimously in favour of a resolution for a constitutional amendment that would end the application to Quebec of subsections (1) to (4) of section 93 (education) of the Constitution Act, 1867. I tabled an identical resolution in the House on April 22, but the election call prevented us from moving to strike a committee to examine this constitutional amendment. That is why I am tabling that resolution again, so that it can be referred to a special joint committee that is to report to Parliament in the coming weeks.

As I have indicated on several occasions, the Government of Canada supports the proposed amendment because it is a good thing for the citizens affected by it and because it enjoys a reasonable degree of support from those citizens.

It is one thing to want linguistic school boards and another thing to want to achieve them by way of a constitutional change. Although the Government of Canada has noted in recent months the existence of a consensus surrounding this proposal, including for the constitutional amendment, we could not flout the democratic traditions that Quebecers share with all their fellow Canadians. The Official Opposition in the National Assembly asked the Government of Quebec, in vain, to strike a parliamentary committee. Therefore, we feel it is necessary to proceed, respecting our parliamentary procedure, by striking a joint committee to which experts, groups and citizens will be able to express their views. Such a committee will allow them to make their opinions known while promoting better understanding of the changes sought by the constitutional amendment.

A desirable amendment that is supported by all the groups affected

For some time now, Quebec society has been secularized and has become considerably diversified through the contribution of newcomers. It is therefore not surprising that this society has questioned on many occasions the appropriateness of a system established on a denominational basis. Throughout the consultations and reports that have marked the past 30 years, a consensus has emerged on the need to reorganize school structures along linguistic, rather than denominational, lines. That consensus was confirmed during the Estates General on Education (1996), which verified that Catholic and Protestant Quebecers, Anglophones and Francophones alike, wanted to establish linguistic school boards.

Quebec’s National Assembly acted on that desire for change by unanimously passing, on April 15, 1997, the resolution to amend section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, with respect to its application to Quebec. Two months later, on June 19, 1997, Quebec MNAs again demonstrated their agreement on this matter by unanimously voting in favour of the legislation that will ensure the implementation of linguistic school boards and govern the place and role of confessionality in Quebec’s school system (An Act to amend the Education Act).

The proposed amendment not only makes it possible to adapt the Canadian Constitution to take account of the deep-seated changes Quebec society has undergone, but it also has the merit of allowing for the changes sought by the vast majority of the citizens that are affected. First, it is noteworthy that the Quebec government is not seeking to exclude any reference to religion in education, but rather to secularize the administrative structures. Many Quebecers are attached to religious instruction, and the Quebec government has taken account of that. Specifically, section 520 of the Education Act, as amended by section 36 and by the schedule of the Act to amend the Education Act, authorizes schools that so desire to retain their denominational orientation. Furthermore, the right to religious instruction is still guaranteed under section 41 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, a document that has quasi-constitutional status according to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Such arrangements help explain the support garnered by the reform sought by the Quebec authorities. While it has not expressed itself on the means used, the assembly of Quebec bishops has nevertheless publicly supported the establishment of linguistic school boards and has not opposed amending section 93. For their part, many groups and associations have endorsed the constitutional amendment requested by Quebec’s National Assembly. By way of example, I would mention the Catholic Committee of the Superior Council of Education, the Federation of School Boards, the Federation of Parents’ Committees, and teachers’ associations representing the entire teaching force of the province.

While section 93 does not protect linguistic rights, language and denomination nevertheless have close historical ties. In the past, Quebec’s Anglophone minority relied heavily on the Protestant school boards to assure its development. The constitutional amendment proposed today does not run counter to the interests of that community, on the contrary. In effect, section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms will continue to provide strong constitutional guarantees to Quebec Anglophones. While section 93 guarantees the existence of denominational management structures in Montreal and Quebec City and the right of dissent in the rest of the province, section 23 allows the minority to control and manage linguistic school structures.

In addition, the establishment of linguistic school boards will allow the Anglophone community to consolidate its school population and thus to establish a more solid foundation for its rights under section 23. As things stand now, Protestant school boards serve a growing number of children whose language of instruction is French. This phenomenon threatens to strip the Anglophone community of its control over those institutions -- institutions which are less and less reflective of sociological reality and which cannot, in any event, address the needs of the Catholic segment of the community. In that regard, it is important to note that students who profess the Protestant faith today account for less than 40% of the school population served by Protestant school boards.

Of course, it is only normal for any minority group to want to increase its constitutional rights. We understand the Anglophone minority’s concerns about its demographic situation, about the provisions that limit access to English schools, and about the secessionist orientation of the current Quebec government. In this light, we understand why some groups in the Anglophone community are using this opportunity to call for the full application of section 23 in Quebec. Nevertheless, the Government of Canada believes that this issue raises a whole other debate. While the proposed amendment does not go as far as some might want, it nevertheless deserves to be passed because it is in the interests of both the minority and the majority in Quebec.

The government of which I am a member has reiterated on a number of occasions that any constitutional amendment must be the subject of a reasonable consensus within the minorities affected. I am pleased to note that that requirement is met in this case. The Government of Canada solemnly affirms that the same requirement would be indispensable in the event that another province called for an amendment with respect to guarantees for minorities within its territory.

Conclusion


Quebec society has succeeded in reaching a consensus on a constitutional issue which touches upon such vital issues for citizens as schooling, language, religion and the Constitution. For that reason, and because it will benefit the Quebec community as a whole, the Government believes that this amendment should be passed.
 


  Printer-Friendly Version
Last Modified: 1997-10-01  Important Notices