![Welcome](site/images/nav_home_off_e.gif)
![Overview](site/images/nav_survol_off_e.gif)
![Communications](site/images/nav_com_on_e.gif)
![Consultation](site/images/nav_cons_off_e.gif)
![Secretariat's Staff](site/images/nav_staff_off_e.gif)
|
Communications
CRISIS MANAGEMENT
OBSERVATIONS
- Crises are inevitable. The question is not whether an organization will find itself embroiled
in a crisis, but how soon and how big?
- There are different types of crises. The Oxford dictionary defines a crisis as “a moment of
danger or suspense in politics, commerce, etc.”
- A crisis is a crisis when the media, Parliament and/or credible or powerful interest groups
identify it as a crisis. A crisis need not pose a serious threat to human life, but it must
somehow challenge the public’s sense of appropriateness, tradition, values, safety, security
or the integrity of the government.
- A crisis is exacerbated if there appears, even briefly, to be confusion or nobody in
control.
- From a communications standpoint, the media develop a symbiotic relationship with interest
groups.
- Most electronic-media-focussed crises are short-lived.
- During a crisis, the logical concept of risk versus benefit is suspended. If the issue of
risk is to be discussed, only zero-risk explanations are acceptable to the public and the
media.
- Every crisis is different, but all share to some extent the following characteristics:
- Surprise;
- Insufficient information when you need it most;
- Events outpace response by organization (real or perceived);
- Escalating flow of events;
- Loss of control (real or perceived);
- Important interests at stake;
- Intense scrutiny from the outside;
- Development of a siege mentality;
- Panic;
- Disruption of regular decision-making processes; and
- Affected managers focus on short-term planning/decision/action.
- Although every crisis is different, the media and interest groups react with predictable
sameness. Three key questions invariably provide the focus for their attention:
- Who is to blame (when will the party “at fault” be fired)?;
- When did the organization discover the problem, what did it do before it became a public
crisis, and what is it doing now that it is a crisis?; And
- How can the interests at stake be protected and/or compensated?
- Effective crisis management depends, to a large degree, on effective communications — within
the organization and with external interest groups.
How a crisis is handled in the opening hours can determine if it lasts for a week and is then
over, or if it does damage which lasts for years.
- During a crisis, particularly in the early stages, there tends to be a natural resistance
within an organization embroiled in a crisis to be forthcoming with information. This may
exacerbate the perception that events are outpacing the response.
The usual arguments for being silent during this critical stage must be resisted. These
include:
- We need to assemble more facts;
- We shouldn’t be panicked into action;
- We haven’t got the right spokesperson;
- There are legal implications we must consider;
- We must be careful of our corporate image;
- We must safeguard powerful interests or important institutions/industries;
- We don’t know the solution to the problem;
- We want to be careful we don’t reveal competitive information.
These are all valid considerations, but not with respect to first communications with the
public.
- The reasons for communicating are far more compelling and avoid problems implied by each
of the reasons for not doing so. They include:
- Address concerns of the affected public;
- Initiate contact with or respond to the media;
- Control escalation factor — avoid confusion;
- Ensure that you are seen to be taking action; and
- Provide valid and timely guidance on what affected persons should do.
|
|