THE HONOURABLE STÉPHANE DION AND THE HONOURABLE
ANNE MCLELLAN OUTLINE THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO THE FEDERAL
SPENDING POWER
OTTAWA, ONTARIO, February 5, 1999
– The Honourable Stéphane Dion, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and
President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, and the Honourable Anne
McLellan, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, have today
released the attached paper, entitled "Collaborative
Use of the Spending Power for Intergovernmental Transfers: The Race to the Top
Model".
The paper sets out the reasons why
the Government of Canada believes the approach contained in the Framework to
Improve the Social Union for Canadians will make possible a use of the
federal spending power in intergovernmental transfers that will serve Canadians
well.
-30-
For information:
André Lamarre
Press Secretary
(613) 943-1838
Collaborative
Use of the Spending Power
for Intergovernmental Tranfers
The Race to the Top model
February 5, 1999
The Honourable Stéphane Dion,
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the Queen’s Privy
Council for Canada, and the Honourable Anne McLellan, Minister of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada, have today released the attached paper, Cooperation
in the Use of the Spending Power in Intergovernmental Transfers: The Race to
the Top Model.
The paper sets out the reasons
why the Government of Canada believes the approach contained in the Framework
to Improve the Social Union for Canadians will make possible a use of
the federal spending power in intergovernmental transfers that will serve
Canadians well.
The Framework to Improve the
Social Union for Canadians, concluded on February 4, 1999, contains much
good news for all citizens of our country. The signatory governments, while
respecting their constitutional powers and jurisdictions, have committed
themselves to enhancing mobility throughout Canada, keeping Canadians better
informed, acting with greater transparency, and following a new conflict
prevention and resolution mechanism. The governments have also made a commitment
to consult one another more and to work together in partnership for Canadians.
One of the expressions of this
partnership will be a totally innovative way of using the federal spending power
for intergovernmental transfers, including both cost-shared programs and federal
funding. This paper explains why the Government of Canada believes that this new
formula for intergovernmental cooperation, called the "race to the
top" method, will enhance the quality of social and health programs
throughout Canada.
1. The federal spending power
in the international and Canadian context
All major federations in the world
provide for a "spending power" for their federal and constituent
governments. By this, it is meant that governments are able to spend in areas
outside their legislative jurisdiction under the constitution. In Canada, the
federal and provincial spending power is a constitutionally legitimate
instrument, recognized as such by the courts for many years. In the case of the
federal spending power, it has been sanctioned most recently by the Supreme
Court of Canada in 1989, 1991 and 1997.
The exercise of the spending power
of the federal government varies from federation to federation. In Canada, it
has been used less often and with fewer conditions than in virtually any other
federation.
The federal spending power has been
a vital element of social development in all developed federations. In Canada,
it has been instrumental in building with the provincial and territorial
governments the Canada-wide social programs which all Canadians value, such as
Medicare. It has been essential in promoting equality of opportunity for all
Canadians, helping to ensure access to basic social programs and services of
reasonably comparable quality to Canadians wherever they live or move in Canada.
When the Government of Canada uses
its spending power to promote equality of opportunity in an area of provincial
responsibility — notably, in health care, post-secondary education, social
assistance and social services — it normally does so through intergovernmental
transfers. The scope of such intergovernmental transfers in these areas has
evolved considerably over the past 50 years.
Now that governments have put their
finances in better order and are preparing to reinvest in Canada’s social
solidarity, the time has come for change in how transfers to the provincial and
territorial governments are used. Governments must find a model that will help
them use such social transfers to serve the needs of Canadians for the future.
2. The need for a new
model
Simply put, the new model should
inhibit any pressures for a "race to the bottom" in social programs
and services for Canadians. It must, instead, create incentives for a race
to the top.
What is needed is a model that
allows the federal government to work cooperatively and flexibly with provincial
and territorial governments for any new Canada-wide initiative in health care,
post-secondary education, social assistance and social services funded by
intergovernmental transfers, whether federally funded or cost-shared.
The model should enhance governments’
capacity to work together towards common objectives for Canadians.
Such a model should respect fully
the responsibilities of all governments in the social area and avoid disputes
about jurisdiction, with which Canadians have little patience. It should promote
consensus among governments but avoid paralysis. It should fully recognize
Canada’s federal nature and the diversity of needs, situations and aspirations
that exists across the country. It should allow each provincial and territorial
government to design policies and programs appropriate to its own circumstances
and should guarantee no future duplication.
The model should recognize that
provincial and territorial governments are often at very different stages of
development when it comes to particular Canada-wide social policy goals. It
should promote innovation and experimentation, and make sure the most effective
initiatives in one province or territory can, over time, be made available
across Canada.
Finally, the model should also
promote equality of opportunity through adherence to the Framework to Improve
the Social Union for Canadians itself: Canada-wide principles, commitments
on mobility, better accountability to Canadians, and public recognition of the
roles, responsibilities and contributions of each order of government.
Section 5 of the Framework to
Improve the Social Union for Canadians provides such a model. The following
paragraphs explain how this new form of intergovernmental cooperation will work.
3. "Race to the top"
— How it works
For any new Canada-wide initiatives
funded through intergovernmental transfers, including both cost-shared programs
and federal funding, for health care, post-secondary education, social
assistance and social services, federal, provincial and territorial governments
will first seek agreement on priorities and objectives. The initiative will not
proceed unless the federal government and a majority of provinces agree. The
design of programs and policies to achieve the agreed objectives will be the
responsibility of each province and territory.
The Government of Canada thus will
commit itself to proceed with new intergovernmental social transfers in these
areas only with the consent of the majority of the provinces.
Each province and territory will be
responsible for designing programs and policies to achieve the agreed
objectives.
The federal and
provincial/territorial governments will also agree on an appropriate
accountability framework for such new Canada-wide initiatives.
The nature and cost of programs
required to achieve the agreed objectives will be evaluated. The amount of the
new federal transfer will be based on how much is thought to be required to
achieve the agreed objectives. Distribution will be determined as if no
provincial/territorial government programs were in place. Thus, provincial and
territorial governments with similar programs already in place — "first
movers" — will not be penalized.
Financial compensation will be
provided to all provincial and territorial governments agreeing to make
available to their citizens programming that meets the agreed objectives and to
respect the agreed accountability framework.
A provincial/territorial government
which, because of its existing programming, would not require the total transfer
to fulfill the agreed objectives will be able to reinvest any funds not required
for those objectives in the same or a related priority area. For example, in the
case of a new health care initiative, a provincial/territorial government may
wish to invest in the same area, i.e. health, or in a related area,
e.g. programs for early childhood development.
Thus, where such programming did not
exist, 100% of the transfer will be spent to meet the agreed objectives; where
programming existed that fully met the agreed objectives, 100% will be spent for
other purposes in the same or a related priority area. In cases where the
provincial/territorial government only partially meets the agreed Canada-wide
objectives, it will invest part of its share to meet those objectives and the
remaining funds in the same or related priorities.
In all cases, all governments will
be bound by the principles and commitments agreed to through the Social Union
Framework Agreement and, as noted, by an appropriate accountability framework.
4. Advantages of the
new approach
This new model for intergovernmental
social transfers has significant advantages for Canadians.
Improving equality of opportunity
for all Canadians — The agreed
objectives will be achieved throughout Canada, although through different
measures and programs, according to the preferences of the provincial
governments. All Canadians, no matter where they live, will thus be able to
benefit from the achievement of these objectives.
Ensuring that each provincial and
territorial government will determine for itself the best design and mix of
policies and programs suited to their needs and circumstances —
Provinces and territories will be able to determine the best design and mix of
policies and programs to meet the agreed objectives. Canadians are better served
when they are offered programs that are tailored to respond to their diverse and
changing needs, rather than "one-size-fits-all" programs.
Enhancing
federal-provincial/territorial collaboration —
The approach will not allow unilateral imposition of new conditions. It will
increase the incentive to pursue common objectives for Canadians while at the
same time enhancing the capacity of provincial and territorial governments to
participate in ways appropriate to them.
Avoiding duplication —
The approach will guarantee that such new initiatives will never duplicate
existing provincial and territorial programs and policies. In fact, the new
federal transfers will strengthen existing provincial and territorial programs,
rather than duplicating them. Moreover, specifying the areas to be covered by
the new approach should reduce jurisdictional disputes.
Encouraging innovation —
The provincial and territorial governments that have
already achieved the objectives in whole or in part will receive funding from
the federal government to innovate as they see fit in the same or a related
priority area.
In short, the model will provide
incentives to participate, reward innovation, avoid duplication and therefore
set in motion a "race to the top".
5. Conclusion
This model for intergovernmental
cooperation responds to the request of Canada’s first ministers in December
1997 to develop a more collaborative approach to the use of the federal spending
power.
The new regime will apply to any new
initiative funded through transfers to the provincial and territorial
governments, including both cost-shared programs and federal funding, in the
areas of health care, post-secondary education, social assistance and social
services. This is by far the largest proportion of provincial/territorial
program spending, including what provincial and territorial governments have
identified as their top priority — health care.
The new framework for
intergovernmental cooperation in social policy will better meet the needs of
Canadians, while respecting the constitutional jurisdictions and powers of each
government.
|