"Implementing the Action Plan
for Official Languages: a plan on paper becoming a reality"
Notes for an address
by the Honourable Stéphane Dion
President of the Privy Council and
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
Speech delivered at the 28th Annual General Meeting
of the Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne du Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
June 21, 2003
Check against delivery
A year ago, I was in Whitehorse, at your Annual General Meeting of the
Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne (FCFA). I told you then
how important it was that the action plan the Government of Canada was preparing
for official languages be inspired by the broad orientation that you and your
partners in Quebec’s Anglophone communities have communicated to us after a
year of consultations and dialogue.
I reflected on the year of consultations that had just taken place, and
indicated the general direction of the action plan. I said it would be developed
around three pillars: education, community development and the federal public
service. I emphasized the extent to which, in your paper entitled Des
communautés en action1, you had focussed on
the implementation of an accountability framework, and I promised that the
Government’s action plan would include such a framework, which would serve as
an ongoing reminder to federal public servants and ministers that linguistic
duality is a priority.
On March 12, 2003, at the Cité collégiale, here in Ottawa, the Prime
Minister of Canada, the Right Honourable Jean Chrétien, the President of the
Treasury Board and I launched the Action Plan2
you now know well. It was a truly festive occasion, the end result of the work
to which we had all devoted so much energy.
But was it really the end result? No, in actual fact it was a beginning, or
as the title of the Plan indicated, a next act, a new momentum for Canadian
linguistic duality. Today, one year after Whitehorse, here again at your Annual
General Meeting, to which you do me the honour of inviting me once again, I am
not saying: mission accomplished! Rather, I am saying: we are clear on the
mission, now we need to accomplish it!
1. The first one hundred days of the Action Plan
A five-year action plan can last only 1,826 days (including February
29 in the leap year!). That is all the time we have to achieve our
objectives. In fact, that’s not quite accurate: 101 days have already passed
since March 12. So we have only 1,725 days left!
The Government has not been idle during those first 101 days. Internally,
first of all, we have done a lot of work, among ministers, among officials, and
among ministers and officials, not just here in Ottawa, but throughout Canada.
The Group of Ministers Responsible for Official Languages, which I chair, has
met. It includes my colleagues who are spearheading the initiatives in the
Action Plan – the Honourable Anne McLellan, Minister of Health, the
Honourable Sheila Copps, Minister of Canadian Heritage, the
Honourable Lucienne Robillard, President of the Treasury Board, the
Honourable Allan Rock, Minister of Industry, the Honourable Denis
Coderre, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, the Honourable Martin Cauchon,
Minister of Justice, and the Honourable Jane Stewart, Minister of Human
Resources Development. Other ministers may be added to that core group,
depending on the files in their sectors and their implications for official
languages.
The Committee of Deputy Ministers on Official Languages (CDMOL) has held two
meetings since the launch of the Action Plan, to take stock of its enhanced
responsibilities under the accountability and coordination framework. It is
especially interested in how to mobilize all institutions, in all sectors and at
all levels, for example to promote research on official languages. In that
regard, an interdepartmental committee met on June 19 for the first time, in
order to define priorities common to all participants, including Statistics
Canada, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the departments of
Canadian Heritage, Human Resources Development, Citizenship and Immigration
Canada and other institutions, such as the Institute for Research on Linguistic
Minorities created last year at the Université de Moncton. The members of the
CDMOL want to get a better understanding of communities; they know you want to
help the Committee in its coordinating function and that you are prepared to
share your concerns. We are still in the early stages of implementation, and you
can be sure the deputy ministers are open to the idea of meeting with you in the
near future.
As you know, the new accountability and coordination framework reminds all
federal institutions of their existing obligations. It does so clearly for each
part of the Official languages Act. But we know it is not enough to set
down those obligations and commitments in black and white; we need to explain
them, to talk about them frequently and seize on opportunities of meetings
between senior officials and their employees, among representatives of different
departments and agencies, and among our offices in every region. That is why we
have undertaken to discuss the accountability framework with the federal
councils, which are forums for senior officials in every region to discuss the
problems in their particular area. I have already talked with the councils in
Atlantic Canada and Quebec, and I propose to do so with those in the other parts
of the country. That is part of the communications plan we are currently
preparing for all federal institutions, which will be distributed starting in
the fall. We do not want to leave anything to chance.
You know that the funding announced in the Action Plan has to be allocated in
accordance with strict rules for Treasury Board submissions. That process,
although it may seem bureaucratic, is indispensable to the sound management
of public funds. The measures considered in each sector are subject to that
inevitable approval process. As a result, the administrative justification for
the funding provided has monopolized a great deal of our efforts since
March 12. That key first step has been taken or soon will be for all
initiatives. The analysis of the deliverables and the means planned for
achieving them will help get everything up and running smoothly in the coming
weeks. All departments have now completed their Treasury Board submissions for
receiving the funding in the Action Plan allocated in this year’s Budget. You
should know that preparing those submissions is no small task.
We have also been in touch with our provincial partners, because a lot of
what is in the Action Plan will not get done without them.
In addition, we are now having an intense dialogue with you. In recent
months, I have had the privilege of meeting with many of you, for example
at a round table with the Fédération acadienne de la Nouvelle-Écosse,
as well as with the Fédération canadienne des enseignantes
et enseignants at a symposium with school principals, French-language
school boards, the Vice-Rector of the University of Ottawa, the President of
York University, the Principal of Glendon College in Toronto, the Commissioner
of the National Film Board of Canada, the Premier of Nunavut and many of my
provincial or territorial counterparts, and with Dr. Adam and her staff. I also
presented the Action Plan to the Standing Committees of the House and the Senate
on official languages. We need to strike while the iron is hot, and build
on the momentum we have created to make a good start on implementation.
2. The blueprint for implementing the Action Plan
To succeed, we will need determination, but we will also need to be well
organized. We need a blueprint. I would like to describe it, as I see it,
for the elements of the Action Plan that will concern you the most in the coming
months. This will help you to establish good contacts with each of the
departments concerned, because they plan to act quickly.
2.1. The accountability and coordination framework
The accountability framework will affect all federal departments and
agencies, under the coordination of the Privy Council Office (Intergovernmental
Affairs) and with the expertise of the Justice Department. Some measures in the
accountability framework are already operational or are about to be so,
including the systematic review of the "official languages" dimension
of memoranda to Cabinet and other Cabinet documents and the review of
initiatives, programs and directions to determine legal implications. Other
measures are planned for the end of the month, and others for the fall. By that
time, the accountability framework will be fully in effect.
I especially draw your attention to the enforcement provisions set out in
article 17 of the framework, which require institutions to take account of
official languages in all their planning. They include raising employees’
awareness of the needs of minority communities, analysing potential implications
of policies and programs at every stage, and consulting with all affected
publics; they also mention the need to show how communities’ needs have
been examined and considered. The Government is currently finalizing a
background paper that will explain that process and give examples of its
application to actual files.
The Accountability Framework also provides for annual consultations between
the Government of Canada and communities, in addition to those you hold
regularly with individual agencies and departments. A preliminary consultation
was held in that connection with representatives of Francophone and Anglophones
communities on May 26 and 29 respectively.
We are currently preparing for the major consultations for Year 1 of the
Action Plan, which will take place starting in the fall.
2.2. Education
My colleague the Honourable Sheila Copps, Minister of Canadian Heritage, will
be responsible on behalf of the federal government for renegotiating existing
agreements with the provinces and territories at the current funding level,
and for bilateral negotiations in the context of two new targeted funds, one for
minority French- or English-language education ($209 million) and one for
second-language instruction ($137 million). Negotiations are proceeding apace on
renewing the MOU with the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, which
expired in March 2003; interim measures are currently in place. Discussions have
begun on the negotiation of agreements for allocating the new targeted funding,
with the objective of concluding the negotiations by next winter.
As you can see, you have no time to lose: do not delay in setting your own
priorities and communicating them to your Ministry of Education. By working
together, we will have the best chance of selecting the most promising projects
for high-quality, accessible education that are relevant to community and
cultural life, in accordance with the directions of the Action Plan:
assistance starting in early childhood,
school proximity,
quality of minority-language education,
student retention in the Francophone system at all levels,
second-language instruction.
2.3. Early childhood
The Department of Human Resources Development is currently preparing new
initiatives, including:
French-language family literacy ($7.4 million over five years), to train
specialists who will then teach daycare educators and other community
stakeholders;
research on the influence of daycare services on young children’s
cultural and linguistic development ($10.8 million); and
support for national advocacy organisations for minority
official-language communities in the early childhood development field
($3.8 million).
We need to ensure that literacy teaching materials are ready, prepare to
select five pilot projects where research on daycare services will be focussed,
and inform eligible organisations of the prevailing funding criteria. A workshop
by the Commission nationale des parents francophones was held at the
beginning of the month, at which the program objectives were discussed. So we
are laying the groundwork which will, in addition to the Treasury Board
submission, guarantee our success.
2.4. Health
As you know, the health component of the Action Plan consists of a total
investment of $119 million over five years, divided among the following three
priorities:
training, recruitment and retention of health professionals
($75 million, including $63 million for Francophone communities),
notably to train over 1,000 professionals capable of practising in French;
networking ($14 million, including $10 million for Francophones), to
ensure liaison between health managers and professionals, specialized
teachers and all community members; and
primary health care ($30 million, including $20nbsp;million for
Francophones), for care better adapted to your realities, within the
provincial and territorial systems. (Funding will come from the envelope of
the Primary Health Care Transition Fund earmarked for minority
official-language communities, which first ministers agreed on in 2000).
Health Canada, led by the Honourable Anne McLellan, is doing
everything necessary to ensure a contributions program is up and running in the
coming months. Already, a Francophone consortium is bringing together
12 educational institutions; together with the Department, they are working
to develop contribution agreements for Phase 2 of the Centre de formation en
santé project, expanded to other regions of the country – as we had
hoped. On the Anglophone side, McGill University is currently the hub for
activities, with the support of the Quebec government. So that is the
"training and retention support" component of the contributions
program.
In addition, pending Treasury Board approval, Health Canada will negotiate an
agreement with the Société Santé en français, for Francophones, and
another with the Quebec Community Groups Network, for Anglophones, to
maintain or create networking units, under the "networking support"
component of the aforementioned contributions program. The $30-million envelope
earmarked for primary care, which will be in addition to the current funding, is
designed to provide care better adapted to the realities of minority
official-language communities in every region of Canada.
There is every indication that the necessary agreements will be in place
within a year. While the department is preparing the ground, work is continuing
with the advisory committees
for minority Francophone communities and Anglophone communities. Our efforts
and yours are converging.
2.5. Justice
You will recall that the federal government is allocating $45.5 million over
five years in the justice sector, for action at two levels:
Meeting the legal obligations stemming from the implementation of the Legislative
Instruments Re-enactment Act and the Federal Court ruling on the Contraventions
Act case ($27million).
Access to the justice system in both official languages, through an
$18.5-million investment in projects with partners (both governmental and
non-), stable funding for jurists’ associations in your communities, the
creation of a consultation mechanism for communities, and training tools for
legal counsel assisting federal institutions on language rights.
Regarding the Contraventions Act, an agreement has been signed with
Ontario. There is a need to amend the existing agreements with five provinces
(Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick) and
conclude new ones with the other provinces and territories. For the Legislative
Instruments Re-enactment Act, the nature of the work is different. We need
to inventory all legislative instruments and identify those that could be struck
down because they were enacted in only one language. The coordinating team
should begin work in September 2003.
On enhancing access to services, funding terms and conditions are about to be
submitted to Treasury Board, and management of the National Program for the
Integration of Both Official Languages in the Administration of Justice (POLAJ)
has been transferred to Justice Canada. A training plan for legal counsel
has been prepared.
2.6. Immigration
The Honourable Denis Coderre told you yesterday of what he plans to do to
encourage more immigrants to settle in Francophone communities like yours.
The Action Plan earmarks $9 million to that end, over five years.
2.7. Economic development
The Industry Minister, the Honourable Allan Rock, and the four
secretaries of state for regional development, together with the
Minister of Human Resources Development, the
Honourable Jane Stewart, have set three common objectives in the
area of economic development and employment for communities:
Increase communities’ capacity to participate in the knowledge economy,
mainly through funding of 200 new projects under the Francommunautés
virtuelles program ($13 million).
Offer business internships to community youth (around $7.3 million
reallocated from existing programs and $2 million in new funding), and
provide improved access to e-training ($10 million over five years).
Enable communities to benefit from existing programs, by providing
information and consulting services on-site ($8 million over the life of the
Plan).
We expect to be able to fund new Francommunautés virtuelles projects
starting in January 2004. For internships and training, the departments are
working with their university and college partners and the private sector; some
pilot projects are already on the table and over the coming months more
information will be available on how to submit such proposals. For on-site
information services, Industry Canada’s regional offices have undertaken to
staff new positions by December 2003. It is planned to use mechanisms
well-known to you (the coordinating groups on economic development and
employability (RDÉEs) and the Community Economic Development and Employability
Committees (CEDECs), sectoral tables, and other structures put in place by the
regional development agencies) to maintain an effective dialogue with you, in
the communities.
Conclusion
I could go on at great length in describing everything the Government plans
to do in the coming months, but I think you get the message: the Action
Plan will not be an abstract document, it will be a tangible reality that will
be characterized by our teamwork. So build on your contacts with all the
departments, provide them with your views, your projects, your priorities, with
precision and conviction, as usual! And do not hesitate to contact me if I can
be of help to you.
There is one last thing I want to say in conclusion. Many of you have
expressed your concerns about the future of the Action Plan under another
prime minister, other than Jean Chrétien, with a new Cabinet. I do not
share those concerns for two reasons. First of all, I believe that the
Liberals will win the next election, if I may be so partisan. Second, I know the
three candidates vying to succeed Jean Chrétien. Sheila Copps, who has headed
up Canadian Heritage for seven years now, has devoted her boundless energy to
the cause of official languages, and French in particular. She has been of
invaluable assistance in preparing the Action Plan, and she believes in it
wholeheartedly. John Manley, at Finance, found the funding required because
Canada’s linguistic duality is part and parcel of his vision of Canada. And I
know the same holds true for the frontrunner, Paul Martin, who said in the
debate in Charlottetown3 that he endorsed the
Action Plan for Official Languages 100%.
I can understand your concern: someone like Jean Chrétien, the champion of
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, cannot be replaced. But he
can be succeeded, and the person who will succeed him will be a Liberal
convinced of the need for Canada to support its linguistic duality, a Liberal
determined that the commitments the Government has made to you will be kept.
Yes, the Government of Canada will be for you, as it says in the Action Plan,
"an effective partner, present and participating."4
- Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne du Canada. Des
communautés en action : politique du développement global à l’égard
des communautés francophones et acadiennes en milieu minoritaire,
unpublished document, May 2002.
- Canada, Privy Council Office. The Next Act : New Momentum for Canada’s
Linguistic Duality. The Action Plan for Official Languages. Ottawa,
2003.
- Liberal Party of Canada leadership debate, Charlottetown, May 24, 2003.
- The Next Act, p. 48.
|