The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Ruling on
Softwood Lumber
May 3, 2002
Wrapping up its countervailing and anti-dumping investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission (ITC) found that Canadian softwood lumber
exports have posed a threat of injury to U.S. lumber producers.
This ITC decision was not unexpected. It is in keeping with the protectionist
nature of other recent U.S. softwood lumber decisions – decisions that Canada
is already challenging in the World Trade Organization and the North American
Free Trade Agreement.
We will conduct an immediate review regarding possible challenges of the ITC’s
decision as soon as the ITC provides its reasons. We feel it is important for
governments to gain a clear picture of the finding as we determine how to
respond to it.
The decision of the ITC means that all bonds posted should be cancelled as in
the past, and that cash deposits made prior to May 16 should be refunded as in
the past by the U.S. Customs Service, thus eliminating over $760 million in
contingent duty liabilities being carried by Canadian lumber producers.
It is hard to understand how the U.S. Commission found a threat of injury
given the stable Canadian share of the U.S. market, the strong U.S. lumber
market and U.S. industry profitability.
The decision of the ITC does not change our course of action.
We are extremely sensitive to the impact the U.S. duties will have on
Canadian workers, communities and firms.
The Government of Canada, through its united approach with the provinces and
industry, will continue to defend the rights of the Canadian softwood lumber
industry at the World Trade Organization and under the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Our case is solid and we are confident we will prevail.
We will continue to argue the simple facts: that the Canadian softwood lumber
industry's success in the American market reflects its competitiveness –
nothing more nothing less.
We are talking to our provincial partners and the industry to assess how best
to protect the interests of communities and workers.
|