Canadian Medical Association Journal Home

Table of Contents
Free eCMAJ TOC

Back issues
Supplements
Selected series

eLetters
About this journal
Info for authors

PubMed

Validity of utilization review tools
CMAJ 2000;163(10):1239[Letters in PDF]


See response from: N. Kalant, et al
It is hardly surprising that standard utilization review tools developed for US hospitals are not useful in Canada [Research].1 They have been developed for a different context.

Communities decide how they will deliver care to their constituents. For example, urban communities with a mature home care program will require fewer hospital days than rural communities where it is not cost worthy to provide a full home care program to all who need it.

One way to increase agreement between clinicians and administrators is to support a process in which clinical experts, administrators and communities decide the appropriate setting for various forms of care. Custom-made utilization review tools can then be implemented to test each day whether patients are in the agreed-on and appropriate setting. These systems can also prompt health care providers to move people to the most appropriate setting.

The aim of utilization review is to increase efficiency and value. In this case, a measure of efficiency would be days of care related to change in health. Consequently the most valuable utilization review tools will be able to link health care activities with health care results to help health care providers understand which activities are pertinent to a result and which are superfluous.2

David Zitner
Director
Medical Informatics
Donald Fay
Shared Care Informatics
Neil Ritchie
Office of the Dean
Faculty of Medicine
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS


References
  1. Kalant N, Berlinguet M, Diodati JG, Dragatakis L, Marcotte F. How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds? CMAJ 2000;162(13):1809-13.
  2. Zitner D, Paterson G, Fay D. Methods in health decision support systems, methods for identifying pertinent and superfluous activity. In: Tan J, editor. Health decision support systems. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen Publishers; 1998.

 

 

Copyright 2000 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors