Canadian Medical Association Journal Home

Table of Contents
Free eCMAJ TOC

Back issues
Supplements
Selected series

eLetters
About this journal
Info for authors

PubMed

Calculating waiting times retrospectively
CMAJ 2001;164(1):14 [PDF]


In their study of the bias inherent in retrospective waiting-time studies, Boris Sobolev and colleagues showed that median and mean waiting times are underestimated in retrospective design, a phenomenon they attributed to patients being removed from the list but included in prospective assessment [Research].1

However, there is another, more important bias, which may help at least in part to explain the results presented by Sobolev and colleagues: waiting lists are not managed as perfect queues. In theory, patients receive treatment in the order in which they were placed on the waiting list, but in practice, treatment may be provided in a nonchronological order. This may lead to underestimation of real queuing times measured prospectively because waiting time in the queue-jumping subpopulation lowers mean foreseeable waiting times. This is possible in practice because those providing the services tend to keep some spots open, i.e., programmed productivity is slightly less than maximal service availability (and slightly less than actual service productivity).

Aldo Mariotto
Head
Health Community Service
Pordenone, Italy


Reference
  1. Sobolev B, Brown P, Zelt D, Shortt S. Bias inherent in retrospective waiting-time studies: experience from a vascular surgery waiting list. CMAJ 2000;162(13):1821-2.

 

 

Copyright 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors