Canadian Medical Association Journal Home

Table of Contents
Free eCMAJ TOC

Back issues
Supplements
Selected series

eLetters
About this journal
Info for authors

PubMed

Patient-controlled analgesia
CMAJ 2001;164(5):620 [PDF]


In response to: D.J. Doyle, K.J. Vicente
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), introduced by Abbott 17 years ago, inaugurated a new standard for the safe management of pain by simplifying the administration of potent pain medications. Since Abbott's LifeCare PCA system was introduced in 1988, more than 22 million patients have used it safely. According to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) safety database, the incidence of serious injury or death reported with the Abbott PCA system remains low.1

Unfortunately, no technique for delivering medication is completely risk free. The LifeCare PCA system is safe and reliable when used as directed, but as with any device its operation is subject to human error. Abbott is concerned about and examines every patient complication involving its PCA system. Following the incident cited by John Doyle and Kim Vicente, Abbott immediately reported the event to the FDA. Independently, we convened a group of practising anesthesia and pain-management experts from academic and private-practice settings to objectively review the potential for human error in operation of the device and to solicit their advice for future improvements. Abbott has endeavoured to further reduce PCA-related errors by improving labelling and by making prefilled syringes available. The company has also developed continuing medical education programs in cooperation with the Institute for Safe Medication Practices.

To further reduce the possibility of error, Abbott developed the PCA III, a next-generation device that will be introduced this year. The new PCA pump will feature numerous safety improvements, including sophisticated, integral bar-code technology that will automatically load information about the drug and drug concentration into the device. This technology addresses the major concern raised by Doyle and Vicente related to inconsistencies between a loaded drug's actual concentration and the concentration programmed by the clinician. By eliminating the need to program this information, this state-of-the-art technology offers a substantial advance in reducing the risk of medication error.

Charles H. McLeskey
Senior Director, Clinical Development
Abbott Laboratories — Hospital Products Division
Abbott Park, Ill.


Reference

    1.   US Food and Drug Administration. MedWatch. Rockville (MD): The Administration; Jul 1997 – Jun 2000.

 

 

Copyright 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors