Canadian Medical Association Journal Home

Table of Contents
Free eCMAJ TOC

Back issues
Supplements
Selected series

eLetters
About this journal
Info for authors

PubMed

Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: adjuvant systemic therapy for node-positive breast cancer (summary of the 2001 update)
Mark Levine, for the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer
CMAJ 2001;164(5):644-6 [PDF]


See also:
   •  Chemotherapy for older women with node-positive breast cancer D. Ginsburg; M. Levine
   •  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 8. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-positive breast cancer (2001 update)
   •  Q&A Guideline 8: Anticancer drug treatment for node-positive breast cancer (revised Mar. 6, 2001)

This article provides a summary of changes made by Health Canada's Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer to the article "Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 8. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-positive breast cancer," originally published in 19981 (the 2001 update is now online). There have been some significant changes to this guideline based on data from the recent meta-analysis of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group2,3 and from individual randomized trials. The updated guideline contains revised recommendations regarding the types of chemotherapy regimens to use in premenopausal women, the use of tamoxifen in premenopausal women who refuse chemotherapy and the use of tamoxifen in women over 70 years of age (Table 1).

The Steering Committee's original guideline had recommended either doxorubicin (Adriamycin) plus cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. It also made a preliminary recommendation for a more aggressive regimen with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) on the basis of results from a trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. After an extended follow-up, the updated results of that trial have now been published.4 Compared with CMF, CEF resulted in improved disease-free survival (63% v. 53%) and overall survival (76% v. 70%) at 5 years.

In addition, a new chemotherapeutic agent, paclitaxel, was evaluated. Paclitaxel is a member of a class of drugs known as taxanes. These drugs act by interfering with microtubules, thereby disrupting the normal mitotic process. Thus they can potentially be used together with anthracycline compounds (doxorubicin, epirubicin), which act by interfering with DNA replication. A number of clinical trials are investigating the incorporation of taxanes with anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting. A large multicentre trial involving women with node-positive breast cancer showed that adding paclitaxel after AC chemotherapy provided a better result than AC alone.5 At a median follow-up of 30 months, there was a 22% reduction in the risk of recurrence and a 26% reduction in the risk of death. The benefit was confined to women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumours. For women with ER-positive tumours who were taking tamoxifen, no statistically significant difference was detected in the risk of recurrence or death. A second large multicentre trial, however, failed to detect a statistically significant difference between AC alone and AC followed by paclitaxel.6 The data are therefore inconclusive at present and require longer follow-up. In the above studies, both the CEF regimen and the AC regimen followed by paclitaxel were associated with an increased incidence of side effects.

The Steering Committee's updated guideline recommends the AC, CMF or CEF regimen for node-positive breast cancer. A firm recommendation for AC followed by paclitaxel is not made. The committee felt that the data were preliminary based on a relatively short follow-up. However, a highly informed and motivated patient may wish to receive this regimen. Participation in clinical trials is encouraged. As before, the choice of chemotherapy regimen depends on the individual woman's preference.

In the original guideline no recommendations could be made concerning high-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell support. The results of 2 randomized trials published since then do not support this form of treatment. In one trial, conducted in the United States and Canada, women with disease involving 10 or more axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and BCNU (bis-chloronitrosourea) plus stem-cell support or intermediate doses of these drugs.7 No difference in breast cancer recurrence and mortality was detected between the 2 groups. In a Scandinavian trial, women with high-risk primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either a dose-intensive regimen consisting of 9 cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or 3 cycles of FEC followed by high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support.8 No difference in overall survival was detected between the groups.

In the original guideline ovarian ablation was recommended for premenopausal women who refused chemotherapy. In the 1990 meta-analysis by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, data on the use of tamoxifen in premenopausal women were inconclusive. In the group's 1995 analysis, there was a 45% proportional reduction in recurrence among women with ER-positive tumours receiving tamoxifen for 5 years.3 In the updated guideline, the Steering Committee now recommends the use of tamoxifen in premenopausal women who refuse chemotherapy or ovarian ablation.

The original guideline recommended the use of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ER-positive tumours. It was suggested that patients might benefit further by the addition of chemotherapy. In the recent meta-analysis by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group, there was a 19% proportional reduction in recurrence and an 11% proportional reduction in mortality among women who received chemotherapy plus tamoxifen compared with those given tamoxifen alone.2,3 The additional benefit of tamoxifen plus chemotherapy over tamoxifen alone in this group of women is supported by several other recent trials, which are discussed in the updated guideline. Given these findings, the Steering Committee now recommends the addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive tumours. Personal preference and quality of life also influence the choice of chemotherapy.

The Steering Committee's original recommendation for AC or CMF chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with ER-negative tumours who are fit to receive chemotherapy is unchanged.

Previously, it was suggested that tamoxifen could be used in women over 70 years of age with ER-negative tumours. More recent data do not support the use of tamoxifen in any women with ER-negative tumours, regardless of age.3,9

The patient version of these guidelines has also been updated and is also online.

Competing interests: None declared.


Dr. Levine is with the Cancer Care Ontario Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre and the Departments of Medicine and of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. The Steering Committee is part of Health Canada's Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative.

Correspondence to: Dr. Mark Levine, c/o Ms. Humaira Khan, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Rm. 2C6, 1200 Main St. W, Hamilton ON L8V 5C2; fax 905 577-0017


References

    1.   Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 8. Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-positive breast cancer. CMAJ 1998;158(3 Suppl):S52-64.
    2.   Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1998;352:930-42. [MEDLINE]
    3.   Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1998;351:1451-67. [MEDLINE]
    4.   Levine MN, Bramwell VH, Pritchard KI, Norris BD, Shepherd LE, Abu-Zahra H, et al, for the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2651-8. [MEDLINE]
    5.   Henderson IC, Berry D, Demetri G, Cirrincione C, Golstein L, Martino S, et al. Improved disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from the addition of sequential paclitaxel (T) but not from the escalation of doxorubicin (A) dose level in the adjuvant chemotherapy of patients (PTS) with node-positive primary breast cancer (BC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17:101a.
    6.   National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000. Bethesda (MD): NIH. (accessed 2001 Jan 29).
    7.   Peters W, Rosner G, Vredenburgh J, Sphall E, Crump M, Richardson P, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of two doses of combination alkylating agents as consolidation after CAF in high-risk primary breast cancer involving ten or more axillary lymph nodes [abstr]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999;18:2a.
    8.   Bergh J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Lidbrink E, Lindman H, Malstrom P, et al. Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 Study. Lancet 2000;356:1384-91.
    9.   Fisher B, Anderson S, Wolmark N, Tan-Chiu E. Chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen for patients with ER-negative breast cancer and negative nodes: results from NSABP B23 [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000;19:72a.

 

 

Copyright 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors