"We are all in the gutter, but some of us..."
Taking Trash Seriously.
"...are looking at the stars."
—Oscar Wilde
May 18, 2006
Price: Your 2¢

This site is updated Thursday at noon with a new article about an artistic pursuit generally considered to be beneath consideration. James Schellenberg probes science-fiction, Guy Leshinski draws out the best in comics, Robin Bougie dredges the cinema sewer and Andrew Smale plays videogames.

While the writers have considerable enthusiasm for their subjects, they don't let it numb their critical faculties. Tossing away the shield of journalistic objectivity and refusing the shovel of fannish boosterism, they write in the hopes of starting honest and intelligent discussions about these oft-enjoyed but rarely examined artforms. Click here for the founding writer's bios and their individual takes on the gutter.


Recent Features


A mid 1970's Drive-In triple bill!

"Visit our snackbar for sodas and hot buttered popcorn!"

Moving Pictures

"Is this the face of a superman?"

Explaining Vampires

"Fledgling was the last book she wrote"

the not-so casual gamer

"When knowledge becomes an essential part of play."

"I'll kiss anything that moves!"

"TV castrated my favourite movie"

Stickhandlers

"Stick figuring."

Forgetful?

Perhaps you'd like an e-mail notification of our weekly update.

Add Remove

Explaining Vampires

by James Schellenberg

Fledgling was the last book she wroteI don’t care that much for vampire stories. It’s a reflexive dislike that’s hard to define - basically, I’m not part of the target audience of the whole vampire fascination.

Another pet peeve of mine is the amnesiac protagonist. What an absolutely lame excuse to explain everything to the audience! When I see that a book features memory loss, I put it down with scarcely another glance.

So it’s a good thing that I ignored my prejudices and read Octavia E. Butler’s Fledgling, a story of a young vampire girl named Shori who wakes up in the forest with no memory of her previous life or how she got there.

An amnesiac vampire… how does Butler pull it off? For one thing, Fledgling shows Butler at the top of her writing game, which takes away some of the pain of the amnesia storyline. In terms of vampire stereotypes, Butler succumbs to none of them: Shori’s story is the furthest thing from an Anne Rice ripoff imaginable.

The quality of Butler’s writing is astonishing - the book is strong, clear, and grabs you even if you don’t want to go along (which was my case). I would rate her work easily the equal of Ursula K. Le Guin; like Le Guin’s recent YA fantasy Gifts, the prose here is never too ornate but it also retains an undeniable esthetic power. It feels right, and it feels compelling.

Vampire stories almost inevitably deal in themes of power and sexuality. What would it like to be under the thrall of a ruthless being like Dracula? Ooo, scary. Butler flips all that on its head by telling the story from Shori’s point of view. And Shori is an intensely sympathetic character, starting with the first thing that we know about her - her entire family has been murdered and then burned to ash along with everything else in their village. Butler keeps these opening segments of the book popping along, and before we know it, we’re firmly on Shori’s side.

It’s true that Shori sucks blood, and this act binds a human irretrievably to her will if it happens more than two or three times. But Butler keeps our sympathy by making Shori a member of a vampire faction that respects humans and is fighting against a splinter group that’s much worse. The ideas and themes of the book are subversive because we can’t help but identify with Shori, the enemy. It’s empathy whether we want it or not.

Fledgling was the last book she wroteButler was not alone in choosing to write a vampire novel after making a reputation with other types of fiction. The biggest other example is Robin McKinley, the well-known YA fantasy author, who wrote a book called Sunshine a few years ago. I decided to read Sunshine after running across this rant (read the comments too) on Suzy McKee Charnas’ blog – as someone who also writes vampire stories, she was making an insider’s complaint that Sunshine explains things in blinding detail. Feeling bold, I would widen the complaint to say that this happens to vampire novels in general, especially if you include Elizabeth Kostova’s bestselling The Historian.

I suppose it’s a matter of life and death, as illustrated by Fledgling. Shori will die if she doesn’t figure out the intricacies of vampire life and vulnerability. In most other books, it’s the humans who need to figure out if garlic works, if a wooden stake will kill, and so forth.

Another thing struck me, less while reading Fledgling and more with regard to The Historian. A topic like vampires is so widely written about that the topic attracts a lot of minutia - is this a vampire like a Stephen King or Anne Rice vampire? Or like a Buffy vampire? The differences are crucial to those involved in the fictional perils (ironically, this is something that I’ve noticed all fictional characters in a vampire story talk about!). In a vicious circle, a writer like Kostova then has to write 600 pages of hardcore history to differentiate her take on vampires from the umpteen other ones.

On a slightly different topic, what does it mean that all of the writers mentioned here (with the exception of Stephen King) have been women? I’m really not sure, since vampire fiction itself varies so much. I would put Butler and McKinley and Kostova in a higher bracket of quality than writers who specialize in vampire fiction like Anne Rice or Laurell K. Hamilton, but this is my own biases showing. All the same, female dominance in writing vampire fiction of all kinds would take a whole new article to unravel.

A sad note to end with. Octavia E. Butler died just a few months ago, and Fledgling was her last book. Butler was a unique figure, a writer who brought enormous quality to the science fiction that she wrote. I highly recommend all of her books; Fledgling is a good place to start, even if it does stand apart from her other books.

There are still bloody cinflicts ,here and there through out our planet, are being managed by some handful monsters are considered to be human beings.But I am still singing for the life, the eternal, not for my father.

—Fuad


Chuck your 2¢ into the Gutter


(Not made available on the site.)

(If included it will be hyperlinked to your name.)
Remember info fields for next time?
Notify you when someone replies to this post? Yes


You can use simple HTML for italics, bolding and links.


Paw through our archives

There are still bloody cinflicts ,here and there through out our planet, are being managed by some handful monsters are considered to be human beings.But I am still singing for the life, the eternal, not for my father.

—Fuad

1 comments below.
Pitch in yours.


Of Note Elsewhere

Check out Slate's Why there are no indie video games:"Why should gamers and industry bigwigs care if it's tough for the little guy? Because back when games were cheaper to make, the independents came up with the ideas that moved the business forward."

~

A compelling case for the importance of editing in video: compare Ask a Ninja 1: Ninja-Mart Store to the latest, brilliant Ask a Ninja Special Delivery 4: Net Neutrality.

~

A re-enactment of the first level of Super Mario Bros. at a talent show in Massachusetts. Gotta love the black-suited puppeteers sneaking to and fro!

~
Before the press conferences of the Big Three at E3 2006, TIME magazine explains why Nintendo's strategy for success is "don't listen to your customers". And given the anticipation for their revolutionary new console, it seems to be working.
~

Clive Thompson decides to raise hell: "Let us talk openly about how just totally awesome it is to grab a fully loaded railgun in Quake 4 and wade into a mass of gibbering Strogg aliens and kill and kill and kill again, until there are guts on, like, the ceiling."

And he has a point: "After all, we now live in an age where the pop-culture mainstream has decided that games are fascinating -- but only the 'complex,' socially nuanced ones."

~

View all Notes here.
Seen something shiny? Gutter-talk worth hearing? Let us know!

Obsessive?

Then you might be interested in knowing you can get an RSS Feed here, and that the site is autoconstructed by v3.2 of Movable Type on the No Media Kings server.

Thanks To

Canada Council
We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last year invested $20.3 million in writing and publishing throughout Canada.