Chapter 41
1998 November - December
Index with links to the other chapters
ICS comment (written 2 November 1998):
Certainly it is true that the government of Nova Scotia is not anywhere near up to speed on the Y2K problem. A message posted on an Internet discussion list on Sunday, 1 November 1998, describing an attempt to pry information out of the government about the current status of efforts and plans to deal with the Y2K situation in its computer systems, included this comment: "People are telling us privately that some departments are in desperate shape." My information is scanty, but what I have been able to find out agrees with this gloomy assessment. Perhaps the most telling information of all is the government's persistent refusal to tell us anything whatever about what is happening. It sure makes it look like they have a lot to hide. |
ICS Comment (written Wednesday evening, 4 November 1998):
To me, the most interesting, by far the most interesting, sentence in this story is: "Mr. Harrison said he will begin issuing regular progress reports within ten days on Year 2000 work." Yeah, right. But, what will be in these reports? Will they be filled with the turgid bafflegab that has been the sole content of all of Mr. Harrison's previous statements on the Year 2000 computer problem? For a representative sample of this kind of statement, made by Mr. Harrison on the floor of the Legislature speaking as the cabinet minister in charge of the government's preparations for Y2K, see Hansard, 27 May 1998, page 350: http://www.gov.ns.ca/legi/hansard/han57-1/h98may27.htm#[Page 350] MR. PETER DELEFES: Mr. Speaker, our time is short here. I have a question for the Minister responsible for the Technology and Science Secretariat. MR. SPEAKER: You have 3.3 minutes left. MR. DELEFES: Thank you. The Auditor General's Report on the year 2000 readiness observed that the year 2000 issue is a real threat to government and its ability to provide complete and uninterrupted service to the people of this province at the turn of the century. The Auditor General also noticed that the government must fully consider risks and ensure that sufficient resources are available to deal with the problem. I am particularly concerned about the safety and health of citizens with respect to life support systems, security systems, power generation systems, systems that use embedded chips in their operation. My question, Mr. Speaker. What specific measures has the government taken to ensure that there is no serious disruption of government services to Nova Scotians with respect to the year 2000 readiness and, again, with respect to the health and safety of our citizens? HON. ROBERT HARRISON: Mr. Speaker, I thank the member opposite for his question in this House of Assembly. The question, fundamentally, is the government committed, first of all, to ensuring that the problems with the year 2000 are addressed and that fundamental services are preserved and protected? That is a responsibility of this government. It is a responsibility of the secretariat to serve departments and the responsibility of ministers to ensure that their staff take steps, not only within their department and their mandate, but also with their partners to ensure that essential services are protected from what is very real, complex, and a problem that needs to be addressed. The second issue, are we committing funds? There is no question that the Department of Finance and the departments themselves have a priority to commit funds necessary to address these problems. I would be pleased to entertain further questions from the member opposite, as to details at any time. MR. DELEFES: Mr. Speaker, again to the minister. The Auditor General's Report, again on the year 2000 readiness, emphasizes the limited scope of the government's Year 2000 Project Office. It addresses only eight corporate service units, as well as a few small entities. Many public service sectors are excluded from the project, the Crown Corporations, regional health boards, hospitals, museums, so it is evident that the year 2000 is not a government-wide project. What is the minister going to do for these departments? MR. HARRISON: The Auditor General's Report takes a snapshot of a period of time when, in fact, there were limitations. That is why we have an Auditor General. The departments and the government has ensured that policies are in place for the corporate government and, in addition to that, extended policies to the various department's partners, such as the Department of Education through to its school boards, to ensure that there is a commitment for essential public services and that we honour the commitment to make sure that essential public services are not affected negatively by the year 2000 problem. MR. SPEAKER: The time for Oral Question Period has expired. |
423 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
ICS (webmaster) comment, written 5:00am 5 November 1998:
As the minister responsible for the government's work on the Y2K problem, this (immediately above) was Mr. Harrison's very first statement in the Legislature, made on 27 May 1998. This was six months, to the day, after the minister in charge of Y2K was asked in the Legislature to tell us what was being done. Exactly what did Mr. Harrison say? "...policies are in place ... to ensure that there is a commitment..." What does that mean? There is not a hint of a whisper of a shadow of solid information about what is being done, by whom, and when. Mr. Harrison's vague, uninformative response, quoted above, up to 28 October 1998 was all, every word, the government had ever said in our Legislature about the infamous Millennium Bug. Was Mr. Harrison being evasive, or was he simply unprepared? This was the best he could do, after six months' notice? So, now, we can confidently await the appearance of timely, candid, and informative "regular reports" from this same source? Yeah, right. You wanna know how I think this will unfold? First, there is the ten-day waiting period. So, everyone will have to wait (patiently or impatiently makes no difference to the government) for those ten days to elapse. Then, oops, the ten-day wait turns out to end on 14 November, a Saturday. That's too bad — of course, the report has to be released first to the Legislature, and the Legislature doesn't sit on Saturdays, so we'll have to wait for at least two more days until the Legislature meets on Monday. There's twelve days right there. By now, we're getting pretty close to the Legislature going into adjournement. Bit of a squeaker, but don't get upset, there's still time. Then, we will be told about a series of minor, very regrettable but unforeseen and unavoidable delays in getting out the first of these "regular progress reports". The cumulative effect of these delays will be that no report will appear until after the Legislature has adjourned and gone home to hibernate until next spring. That way, the government won't have to face questioning in the Legislature on the content, or lack thereof, of whatever the report may contain when the first one does finally drift out into public view. However, for the government there is a big benefit attached to Mr. Harrison's promise (of regular progress reports). The government won't have to worry about dodging and evading, or appearing to dodge and evade, questions about Y2K. That huge benefit became effective when the Halifax Chronicle-Herald hit the streets on 4 November, and will continue throughout all remaining sitting days of the current Legislature session. To any and all questions about Y2K, the government can blandly say: Wait for the progress report, which will be available any day now and will contain the answers to all your questions. After the Legislature adjourns, and the MLAs have gone home, and the report finally appears, it won't matter that it contains nothing like adequate answers. There will be no platform for anyone to ask questions. I think that's how Niccolo, the famous political consultant, would have analyzed this very clever manoeuvre. We'll see how the universe unfolds. |
ICS (webmaster) comment, written 3:00am 7 November 1998:
This little speech (resolution 1616) by Mr. Harrison, is a mystery to me. What was his purpose? What could possibly be the point? If he just wanted to speed up the process, seems to me that would have been accomplished far better by following his own advice by picking up his own office telephone and delivering the message directly, instead of waiting for the next Legislature meeting. Each time I read resolution 1616, a mental image forms — of a little boy standing with his thumb to his nose, wiggling his fingers in the air, and singsonging "Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah." |
423 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
ICS comment:
Once again, we see the yawning chasm between what Mr. Harrison says in the Legislature, and what is being done. Mr Harrison speaks approvingly of "this very commendable effort to raise Nova Scotians' awareness about their government's effort to deal with the Year 2000 problem." But, during his seven months as the minister responsible for the government's efforts to deal with that very problem, the record shows nothing but a continuing refusal to divulge any information whatever about that, and a repeated use of methods such as bafflegab and stonewalling that have been standard bureaucratic tactics for centuries when the real purpose is obfuscation and delay. Another example (Hansard page 3314, next below) occurred in the Legislature just one hour later. |
In my dictionary:
obfuscate verb, transitive
(1) to confuse, becloud (2) to make obscure (3) to make difficult of comprehension or interpretation |
ICS comment:
In the summer of 2000, when we will know what really happened, it will be amusing to recall Mr. Harrison's comments this afternoon, and compare them to the actual events. |
423 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
Mr. Harrison said: "Regular updates on (Y2K) progress will be filed on our website..."
Somehow, he forgot to mention what website. Mr. Harrison is the Minister in charge of the Technology & Science Secretariat, which is officially responsible for the Nova Scotia government's response to the Y2K problem. The Technology & Science Secretariat website is at http://www.gov.ns.ca/tss/. At 5:00am Saturday, 7 November 1998, two full working days after Mr. Harrison's statement that "Regular updates on (Y2K) progress will be filed on our website," I searched through this website carefully, looking for any mention of Y2K or the Millennium Bug or the Year 2000. All of the webpages in the site were more than fifteen months old, and contained no mention of Y2K. Is this the website Mr. Harrison spoke of, in the Legislature? If not, what did he have in mind? In the entry page, there were several links leading into the site: The Statement of Purpose link led to a webpage dated 1997-Jul-21, which contained no mention of Y2K or the Millennium Bug or the Year 2000. The Key Activities link led to a webpage dated 1997-Jul-21, which contained no mention of Y2K. The Goals link led to a webpage dated 1997-Jul-21, which contained no mention of Y2K. The Information Technology Standards link led to a webpage dated 1997-Jul-21, which contained no mention of Y2K. The Information Technology Guidelines link led to a webpage dated 1997-Jul-21, which contained no mention of Y2K. At http://www.gov.ns.ca/tss/stds/its3213.htm there is a webpage titled "Desktop Operating Systems." It is dated 1996-Aug-14, more than 26 months ago, and contains nothing about Y2K. At http://www.gov.ns.ca/tss/stds/its2401.htm there is a webpage titled "Data Base Management Systems." It is dated 1996-Aug-14, more than 26 months ago, and contains nothing about Y2K. At http://www.gov.ns.ca/tss/docs/INetGuide.htm#appendix there is a section titled "Acronyms and Definitions." It is dated 1997-Apr-18, more than 18 months ago, and contains no mention of "Y2K" or "Millennium Bug" or anything remotely suggestive thereof. There is a search engine in the entry page of the Nova Scotia Government's website at http://www.gov.ns.ca/. I did a search on "y2k" and got 21 hits, in the entire government site. I looked at most of them — all that were viewable with Netscape (some weren't) — and none could remotely be classified as progress reports on Y2K. What Mr. Harrison may have had in mind when he referred to "Regular updates on (Y2K) progress will be filed on our website..." remains a mystery wrapped in an enigma. Was this what he intended? |
Now we know. Thanks, Mr. Downe. |
422 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
This is the first time the Leader of the PC Party has ever mentioned the Y2K problem in the Legislature. |
418 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
ICS comment (written 4:50am 11 November 1998):
It's great to see the mainstream media finally beginning to get the message, that Y2K really is a major problem. It will be interesting to see how much longer it takes local media, such as the TV networks and the newspapers, to start taking this seriously. So far, the local media has pretty much ignored it. For example, there has been not a word from any newspaper or television station about the numerous refusals of the Nova Scotia government to give a serious reply to repeated questions in the Legislature, over the last two weeks. Of course, Peter Jennings' comment that "the problem is even more complicated, and will be more expensive to fix, than anyone had expected" is rubbish. For years, lots of people have been saying exactly that — thay've been saying and writing it forcefully and repeatedly. The real problem has been that very few in a position of authority, corporate or government, have comprehended what this is about, and the few who have understood have been unwilling to act. And how about that startling news that it is now "too late to head off all the problems"? That was true many months ago. For sizeable companies and government departments, it was too late if they had not started really serious work by mid-1997. For many of those which had started serious work before 1997, it has become too late because of management dithering and false economies and procrastination. The Toronto Stock Exchange is a glaring example of that. |
Thanks for clearing up that matter, Dr. Smith, and for telling us in plain language. Not! |
417 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
410 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
On 4 November 1998, speaking on the floor of the Legislature in his official capacity as the Minister in charge of the Nova Scotia Government's Year 2000 Project, Mr. Harrison said: "Regular updates on (Y2K) progress will be filed on our website..." On 4 November the Halifax Chronicle-Herald printed on its front page an interview with Mr. Harrison. In that interview, Mr. Harrison said he would "begin issuing regular progress reports within ten days on Year 2000 work." Today is a full working week after the end of that ten-day period. It would be reasonable to expect that this clearly-stated public promise would have been implemented in some manner. After the close of the working day on Friday, 20 November 1998, I looked around in the government's website, to see what had been posted, or "filed" as Mr. Harrison said. This was two weeks and two days after Mr. Harrison made that promise. In the government's official website index at http://www.gov.ns.ca/gov_index.asp there is a link "What's New" pointing to http://www.gov.ns.ca/new.htm, a webpage titled "What's New" that begins: "We are pleased that you have come to visit our Government of Nova Scotia World Wide Web site. Keep watching here for new information and services as they become available." This "What's New" webpage seems to be a reasonable location to find the promised Y2K Progress Report, or at least information about where it can be found. But no. The most recent item is dated 10 November, ten days ago, and it reads: If you're looking for information at the Legislative Library in Halifax it's much easier these days." There's no mention of the Year 2000 computer problem. The next item is dated 8 October 1998. All the other items in the What's New webpage are older than that. Most are puff pieces, devoid of content. None mention Y2K. So much for the government's "What's New" webpage. I looked at each of the 94 press releases sent out by the government in the last thirty days. No mention of Y2K. The Technology and Science Secretariat is the department officially responsible for the Nova Scotia Government's Year 2000 Project. Its website is at http://www.gov.ns.ca/tss/. The entry page was last updated 1998-Jul-21. There are several links, which I followed. None contained any mention of Y2K or anything remotely related to the Year 2000 computer problem in the government's operations. It is evident that the Nova Scotia Government's long-standing policy of stonewalling any questions about Y2K in its operations is continuing, despite Mr. Harrison's publicly-stated promise sixteen days ago to "begin issuing regular progress reports within ten days on Year 2000 work." You'd think the man would be embarrassed, or contrite, or show some indication of an awareness of having failed in an important part of his official responsibilities. But no. |
407 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
UNSM: Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities
AMA: (probably) American Municipal Association
ICS comment (written 4:00pm 21 November 1998):
If there was an betting pool or "office pool," to be paid in December 2000, on what the total cost of Y2K to the provincial government will turn out to have been, I would want a ticket for an amount in the range two to three times this estimate — somewhere between $200,000,000 and $300,000,000. To pick a specific amount, my best guesstimate now is $250,000,000. The final amount to be decided by an independent audit — the provincial Auditor General would be my choice — which includes all ABCD costs (those incurred by agencies, boards, commissions, and departments of the provincial government) and the MASH costs (municipalities, schools, hospitals) including hardware and software, with Y2K consultants' fees and expenses included. The 52 MLAs, of all parties, simply do not grasp the depth and reach of this problem. Or, if any of them do, they're keeping very quiet about it. |
406 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
Speed kpbs |
Number of modems |
Percent |
---|---|---|
14.4 | 6 | 3% |
28.8 | 14 | 8% |
33.6 | 99 | 56% |
56.6 | 55 | 31% |
Total | 174 |
402 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
For comparison, here's the price charged for hosting personal websites at this time by Auracom, a subidiary of Interhop, a large provider of Internet connection services in Canada. The stated price per month will have the HST sales tax of 15% added when billed. The price /MB·month (per megabyte per month) includes this 15%.
|
(Written 24 November 1999)
As it turned out, that expectation was unfulfilled. Ten months later, in September 1999, the world price of oil had doubled, to around U$22 to U$23 a barrel. On 23 November 1999 the price reached U$27.00 a barrel, a nine-year high. How much oil is there in a barrel? As a unit of measure, the barrel is notoriously difficult to pin down. The official size of a barrel depends on what it contains. In the 1990s, the U.S. oil barrel is defined as 42 U.S. gallons. One U.S. gallon is equivalent to 231 cubic inches, or 3.79 litres. Thus, one barrel of oil contains 159.2 litres. For most purposes, 160 litres is close enough to a barrel of oil. According to legend, back in the fifteenth century King Edward IV of Norway standardized the herring barrel at a size that corresponds to 159 litres in our modern system of measures. It promptly became the standard for coopers, whisky distillers, and, four centuries later, the oil industry. No one has moved oil anywhere in barrels since the days of the horse and wagon — the barrel survives today not as a tangible physical object but as a unit of measurement... [Saturday Night magazine, 13 May 2000] (distributed as an insert in the National Post of the same date) |
In Hansard, Nov. 4th, 1998, page 3314,
http://www.gov.ns.ca/legi/hansard/han57-1/h98nov04.htm you will find Mr. Harrison's statement: "Regular updates on progress will be filed on our website so that the member opposite, regardless of where he is, can access information, so that we can reassure Nova Scotians that essential service compliance will be carried out by this government and with many sectors of the Nova Scotia society." |
396 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
381 days remaining before 1 January 2000. |
In April 1851 a group of businessmen from Rochester, New York, organized The New York & Mississippi Valley Printing Telegraph Company to build a telegraph line from Buffalo, New York, to St. Louis, Missouri. More lines were soon built. On the 8 April 1856 the name of the company was changed to Western Union Telegraph Company. In May, 1860, the American Telegraph Company leased the telegraph lines and equipment owned and operated by the Nova Scotia Electric Telegraph Company, that is, all telegraph lines in Nova Scotia. ATC now controlled all telegraph operations from Newfoundland to Louisiana. In 1866, the Western Union Telegraph Company took over the leases held in Nova Scotia by the American Telegraph Company, which included all electric telegraph lines and equipment in the province. By March 1872, 53 telegraph offices were in operation in Nova Scotia. In January 1873, advertisements appeared in Nova Scotia newspapers announcing the sale of the Nova Scotia Electric Telegraph Company system to Western Union. After 1866, Western Union continued to operate a telegraph system throughout Nova Scotia into the 1950s.
Sources: http://www.westernunion.com/english/about/history.html http://www.cix.co.uk/~westernunion/wu1m.htm http://edison.rutgers.edu/75-020.htm |
Wayback Machine http://web.archive.org/index.html "Use the Wayback Machine to view web sites from the past." History of Nova Scotia, Chapter 41 The Wayback Machine has copies of this webpage from the early days: Archived: 2000 September 29 http://web.archive.org/web/20000929032657/http://www.alts.net/ns1625/nshist41.html Archived: 2000 December 16 http://web.archive.org/web/20001216224300/http://www.littletechshoppe.com/ns1625/nshist41.html Archived: 2001 February 8 http://web.archive.org/web/20010208225837/http://www.alts.net/ns1625/nshist41.html Archived: 2001 June 16 http://web.archive.org/web/20010616190738/http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/205/300/nova_scotias_electronic_attic/07-04-09/www.littletechshoppe.com/ns1625nshist41.html Archived: 2001 November 22 http://web.archive.org/web/20011122055345/http://www.alts.net/ns1625/nshist41.html |
Index with links to the other chapters
W3C HTML Validation Service
http://validator.w3.org/
W3C CSS Validation Service
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/