|
Debate delivery |
Mainly read the prepared notes; little expression in the voice or face. Showed no passion for the issue. |
Some parts of the prepared notes were read, some eye contact; voice and face had some expression. Showed some passion for the issue. |
Most of discussion was without reference to prepared notes; effort was made to look at several different points in the room; voice used tone and volume appropriately; face was expressive. Showed passion for the issue.
|
The discussion delivery was entirely without reference to notes; eye contact was frequent and natural; voice and whole body was convincingly used to make points and to raise listeners’ enthusiasm. Showed considerable passion for the issue in order to lend weight to arguments.
|
|
Discussion content |
Ideas very difficult to understand; few or no examples or supporting facts.
Showed no grasp of the party’s position.
|
Ideas somewhat difficult to understand; some examples or supporting facts.
Showed some grasp of the party’s position.
|
Ideas were easy to understand; use of some good examples or supporting facts.
Showed a clear grasp of the party’s position.
|
Ideas very clearly explained and structured; use of many good examples or supporting facts.
Showed a superior grasp of the party’s position by linking debate to party’s position on other related issues. |
