Canadian Medical Association Journal Home

Table of Contents
Free eCMAJ TOC

Back issues
Supplements
Selected series

eLetters
About this journal
Info for authors

PubMed

Another modest proposal
CMAJ 2001;164(1):5 [PDF]


See also:D is for drug addiction — and disability [Letter]

You can't help admiring a government that not only recognizes the generosity of the electorate but has the prudence to exploit it. In Ontario, the political satisfaction of the people has been a bargain at $200 per taxpaying head, and no one has complained that this sum is barely sufficient to defray the expense and inconvenience of gathering evidence against fellow citizens for the Welfare Fraud Hotline (1 800 394-7867, if you have information). True, this $1 billion in tax rebates might have been squandered on hospitals or schools, but sorting out requirements for bed spaces and "bums in seats" (the latest school-planning parlance) is such a tedious affair that we might as well concentrate on issues everyone can agree about. Such as the pressing need to stamp out the poor. To stamp out poverty, we mean.

People are dropping off the Ontario welfare rolls like flies, at a rate of 12 per hour.1 Whether this reflects the success of job creation programs, a knock-on effect of the US economy, or the increasing heartlessness of the system is, as moral doubts go, trifling. The justice of any reform may be measured by it efficacy: the drop in welfare payments is truly staggering,2 and we need not be fooled by rising rates of homelessness or the affordability crisis in tenant housing.3 Fortunately, the government is sensitive to the embarrassment of 450 000 people in the province still clinging to their welfare cheques and has proposed mandatory drug testing and treatment as a means of weakening their grip. Only the morally feeble will be distracted by arguments that at least 70% of people with a drug dependence are in fact not on welfare, but employed, that drug testing is a spotty way to get at addiction problems, or that mandatory treatment will founder on the clinical fact of relapse rates.4 Only those with a gift for illogic would question the extension of the drug testing program to people on disability assistance whose only disability is drug addition. No matter what the Human Rights Commissioner says, we cannot deprive anyone of the chance to be, as the Minister of Community and Social Services puts it, saved.

In a progressive society it is not enough to promote health and prosperity. These values must be enforced. Diagnosis and treatment are serious matters that should not be left to the medical profession, with its qualms about patient autonomy, privacy, dignity and consent. The poor must accept that they are in no position to quibble about rights.

But why has no one realized that a solution first proposed in 1729 would further relieve the welfare burden in Ontario? We must persuade the poor to redress their debt to society by selling their children as food. We anticipate some queasiness among the faint of heart, but surely no other expedient will be as effective, least of all that "Of being a little cautious not to sell our ... consciences for nothing."5 — CMAJ


References
  1. In the news [2000 Nov 12]. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Available: www.gov.on.ca/CSS/ (accessed 2000 Nov 27).
  2. Making welfare work: report to taxpayers on welfare reform. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Available: www.gov.on.ca/CSS/page/brochure/makingwelfarework.html
  3. Dunphy N. Where's home? A picture of housing needs in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association; 1999. Available: www.housingagain.web.net/whome/index.html (accessed 2000 Nov 27).
  4. Position statement on mandatory drug testing and treatment of welfare recipients. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2000. Available: www.camh.net/position_papers/mandatory_drug_tests2000.html (accessed 2000 Dec 11).
  5. Swift J. A modest proposal for preventing the children of poor people in Ireland from being a burden to their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the public. Dublin; 1729.

 

 

Copyright 2001 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors