Thanks to the Historic Restoration Society of Annapolis County which provided a copy of the above article. |
Mistaken Report Note by ICS (written 13 March 2002): I believe that Murille Schofield – while researching his above article in 1973 – may have been misled by the following item, which appeared in the Halifax Novascotian on March 12th, 1849: | |
---|---|
Halifax, Monday, March 12th, 1849
| |
This item has the facts badly muddled. Its description of what D.H. Craig was doing closely matches what, in fact, J.T. Smith was doing (employed by private individuals—speculators). And its description of what J.T. Smith was doing closely matches what, in fact, D.H. Craig was doing (engaged by the combined press of New York and Boston). At this very late date – 153 years after these events occurred – we cannot question anyone who was there at the time. We cannot even question the editor of the Novascotian about where he got this information. All we can do is sift through the existing historical record and try to figure out what really happened. Numerous contemporary authoritative historical sources report that Craig, not Smith, was working for the Associated Press. One example: the New Brunswick Courier, 24 February 1849: A little after eight o'clock on Thursday evening last, the steamer Commodore, Capt. Brown, arrived from Digby Basin, bringing Mr. Craig, an American gentleman, who had undertaken on behalf of the Associated Press of Boston and New York to express the news by the Steamer Europa, from Halifax to Saint John, and thence by Electric Telegraph to Boston and New York... Also, we have this description of the situation, signed by nine of the most powerful and influential men in New York's newspaper business of that time: New York, January 24, 1850: — ...That the public may not be misled in this matter, the Associated Press deem it proper to make the following statement of facts ... About January 1849, the New York newspapers Journal of Commerce, Courier and Enquirer, Herald, Sun, Tribune, and Express, through their Committee, in an interview with Mr. L.R. Darrow, the Superintendent of the new Saint John Electric Telegraph Line, then nearly finished, arranged to run an express, on the arrival of each Cunard Royal Mail steamer at Halifax, from that point to Saint John, New Brunswick, the eastern terminus of the Telegraph at that time, on condition of having the privilege of transmitting a despatch of three thousand words to Boston and New York ... There were two competitors for the agency; and the 'superior activity' of the man, and the recommendation of two or three editors in Boston, in the Association, induced us to employ Mr. Craig, the present agent... (Signed) Gerard Hallock, New York Journal of Commerce Horace Greeley & Thomas McElrath, New York Tribune George H. Andrews, New York Courier & Enquirer Moses S. Beach and Alfred E. Beach, New York Sun James Brooks & Erastus Brooks, New York Express James Gordon Bennett, New York Herald New York, January 24, 1850 Another contemporary source, both authoritative and well informed, is the book Historical Sketch of the Electric Telegraph, by Alexander Jones, published by George E. Putnam, New York, in 1852. Dr. Jones was the first general manager of the New York Associated Press, and knew more about what went on in the early years of the AP than anyone else. His book, on page 140, has this: ...The vexations endured by the Associated Press management in the early days (1849-1850) were aggravated by dissentions which grew up between the managers of some of the Morse telegraph lines and the press. There were also contentions between the members of the press in Boston and other places, fanned if not engendered by the jealousies of some of the Morse lines, and especially by those under the control of F.O.J. Smith (not to be confused with J.T.Smith). This gentleman refused to have steamers' news come over his line from Halifax, for the Associated Press, unless they dismissed Mr. Craig, then acting as their Halifax agent. This led to a rupture, by which the press of Boston became divided. The Association retained Mr. Craig, and ran a special locomotive express at an enormous expense with each steamer's news, from Portland to Boston, there being no telegraph between these two points except that owned by Smith. From Boston it came over by the Bain line to New York. The Association also, by its encouragement, caused a company to extend the Bain line from Boston to Portland, where it connected with the lines extending thence to Halifax, and which were beyond the control of Smith. The war was a very fierce one; many phamphlets appeared on both sides, including one by Mr. Craig in his defence against Smith's charges. The latter left no stone unturned. Among other efforts to thwart the Association, it is said that he endeavored to get control of one of the links on the Halifax line east of Portland. He also appealed to the Provincial Legislature of New Brunswick, and protested against the management of the Halifax line by its superintendent; but all without avail ... At one time Smith refused to receive and transmit private messages handed in by merchants and others for Halifax, or to let anything come over his line from Halifax... There are other contemporary reports which agree that Daniel Craig organized and managed the Associated Press express of 1849. Except for the item above, I know of no source that supports the notion that J.T. Smith was working for the Associated Press in any important capacity. I doubt that Mr. Schofield, working in Nova Scotia in the early 1970s, had access to any of these three sources. One is led to speculate where this erroneous report came from. Was this just a case of a reporter getting his facts wrong (which is not unheard-of in our time)? Or is this something more? Maybe the Novascotian's item was the result of calculated disinformation, put out by someone associated with the speculators, perhaps to cloud Craig's reputation? From the speculators' point of view, Craig was a nuisance who insisted on ethical standards in the operation of his international communications system, and this high standard seriously interfered with the speculators' hopes of making a lot of money by getting important information before it became available to the public. If they could somehow destroy Craig's reputation and have him replaced with a more compliant manager, they could quickly make a lot of money. I doubt we can answer these questions now. It is clear that the Novascotian's editor in 1849 had no interest in Craig's express service for New York newspapers. One example of this lack of interest is the item in question – not written by someone in Halifax, but simply copied from a distant newspaper. When a report like this disagrees, in an important way, with credible information published elsewhere about the 1849 express, my view is that we should be cautious about how much weight we give to the Halifax source. ICS (March 2002) |
The Oregon Boundary Dispute was a hot topic during 1849. This dispute has nothing to do with the Nova Scotia Pony Express story, except as a vivid illustration of the importance of some of the information it carried. In the 1844 United States Presidential Election, the Democratic platform claimed the entire Oregon area, from the California boundary northward to a latitude of 54° 40', the southern boundary of Russian Alaska. This claim included all of present-day British Columbia. In 1849, the Oregon Boundary dispute remained unsettled. In 1849, there was a serious threat of war between Great Britain and the United States over the Oregon Boundary question. The excerpts below are included here to enable the reader to get a feeling of the serious nature of this dispute. Some of the mail bags carried by Cunard's Royal mail Steamships in 1849, both westbound and eastbound, contained highly confidential diplomatic messages between London and Washington, conveying veiled threats of a most serious nature. George Mullane's article about the 1849 situation uses direct language: "...international crisis..." and "...England's ultimatum..." which accurately conveys the temper of the times. More about the Oregon Boundary Dispute |
Canadians and Americans tend to recall the Oregon Treaty in distinctly different ways. In this case and in virtually every other, how one interprets the past depends in large part upon where one is viewing it from.
More About the
|