| January |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| February |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| March |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| April |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| May |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| June |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| July |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| August |
A-2012-00013 |
With respect to the Recommendations on Systemic Issues - Case number 2012-045 - Issue section, 3rd paragraph, located at http://www.cfgb-cgfc.gc.ca/english/SR65.html#SR77, please provide the records, in their original Official Language, based on which the Canadian Forces Grievance Board stated that "it is of the opinion that when a CF member is on IR and is receiving SE, the CF expects that the military member and his family will eventually be reunited at the new place of duty, as the aim is to delay, not to replace, the move." |
Disclosed in part |
17 |
|
A-2012-00014 |
Please provide the full record, in its original Official Language, of Case 2012-045, (as opposed to the Case Summary), located at: http://www.cfgb-cgfc.gc.ca/english/2012-045.html. |
Disclosed in part |
7 |
|
A-2012-00015 |
With respect to the Recommendations on Systemic Issues - Case number 2012-045 - Issue section, 3rd paragraph, located at: http://www.cfgb-cgfc.gc.ca/english/SR65.html#SR77, please provide the records, in their original Official Language, on which the Canadian Forces Grievance Board based itself to determine that "in general terms, IR status was put in place in order to provide CF members some flexibility in response to the disruptions caused by relocation for a posting." |
All disclosed |
4 |
| September |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| October |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| November |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| December |
Nothing to report |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
