Archived by Library and Archives Canada / Archivé par Bibliothèque et archives Canada. 20-10-2004. Report from the LibraryNet Workshop Go directly  to Site  Map
Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada
Skip all menus Skip first menu

 Français

 Contact Us

 Help

 Search

 Canada Site

   

 Home

 What's New

 About
 LibraryNet

 Best
 Practices

 LibraryNet
 Monthly

Girl reading a computer screen
LibraryNet Monthly
Best Practices
Funding
Resources
Reports


YES logo

link to home page link to home pagelink to home page
link to home pagelink to home page link to home page
 

Report from the LibraryNet Workshop

June 15-16, 1997
Cantley, Québec


Appendix A: Brainstorming "Ensuring mutual benefit from LibraryNet"
Appendix B: Initial Themes from "Ensuring mutual benefit from Library Net"

Participants in LibraryNet Workshop

Names of members of the LibraryNet Advisory Board are emphasized.

  • Karen Adams, President, Canadian Library Association
  • Judy Anderson, Provincial Public Libraries Board, Newfoundland
  • Diane Bays, LibraryNet Manager, Industry Canada
  • Elise Boisjoly, SchoolNet Director, Industry Canada
  • Greg Buss, Chief Librarian, Richmond (BC) Public Library
  • John Butcher (Facilitator), Associates in Planning Inc.
  • Gwynneth Evans, Director, National and International Programs, National Library
  • Suliang Feng, Territorial Librarian, Northwest Territories
  • Benoit Ferland, Hawkesbury (ON) Public Library
  • Barbara Greeniaus, Director, Library Services Branch, British Columbia
  • Harry Holman, Director, Archives and Libraries, Prince Edward Island
  • Doug Hull, Director General, Science Promotion and Academic Affairs, Industry Canada (June 16 a.m. only)
  • Allan Johnson, Director, Southeast Regional Library, Saskatchewan
  • Jocelyne LeBel, Director, New Brunswick Public Library Service
  • Maggie Macdonald, Chinook Arch Public Library, Lethbridge
  • Pierre Meunier, President, Association pour l’avancement des sciences et des technologies de la documentation (ASTED)
  • Wendy Newman, CEO, Brantford (ON) Public Library
  • Sylvia Nicholson, Director, Public Library Services, Manitoba
  • Julianne Ourom, Manager, Public LIbrary Services, Yukon Territory
  • Marion Pape, Provincial Librarian, Nova Scotia
  • Stan Squires, Manager, Telematics and New Media, Ontario
  • Maureen Woods, Provincial Librarian, Saskatchewan

go to  top of page

Purpose

The purpose of the workshop was to bring together representatives of the LibraryNet Advisory Group with representatives of public libraries and the federal government to:

  • clarify the federal vision and operating parameters for LibraryNet;
  • discuss how public libraries can participate in and gain long-term advantage from LibraryNet; and,
  • identify action steps to ensure mutual support in achieving and sustaining shared objectives.

go to  top of page

Opening Discussion

Elise Boisjoly and Diane Bays outlined how Industry Canada is playing a catalytic role to support Canada's development as a knowledge-based economy. Helping connect libraries and communities on the "information highway" is an important element of that role. The Community Access Program (CAP) provides funding support. Its aim is to connect approximately 10,000 communities to the Internet. Industry Canada is assisting in the development of strategic plans, identification of best practices, and support for pilot projects. Use of the Internet for training is an area of special interest. Sustainability of Internet access sites is another priority issue. In this regard, Industry Canada is considering a telecommunications access strategy. As well, the banks and phone card firms have been approached about pilot projects.

Industry Canada sees a strong role for libraries in supporting learning opportunities for Canadians and the associated economic development arising from connection to the Internet. To date, some 1150 libraries (including 100% of the libraries in Nova Scotia) have been linked to the Internet. (Nova Scotia was able to achieve a "double-barrel" effect through connection both to the Internet and to on-line catalogues in public access sites in schools and libraries.) British Columbia and Prince Edward Island will also soon have 100% coverage of their libraries.

Several participants pointed out that many provinces have similar objectives to those of Industry Canada and are moving ahead in this area independent of federal CAP support. CAP has, however, frequently enabled an increased level of service. As well, in some provinces, the majority of CAP projects have been led by libraries. Both Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island are signing memoranda of understanding with the federal government to jointly manage CAP. Other provinces are considering such agreements. There is strong support for CAP in many provinces: the need remains, however, to focus on the identity of libraries in the federal agenda.

Some participants were still unsure of the federal vision for LibraryNet. In brief, Industry Canada sees LibraryNet contributing to increased access by Canadians to the information highway and to the enhancement of Canadian competitiveness within the global economy. In this regard, the role of libraries is still unfolding.

In some areas, participants reported tensions between the school and library communities around issues of access and competing agendas. In such situations, CAP has sometimes worked against successful provision of services. Some school-based sites seemed to become less enthusiastic once they had installed the associated hardware. As well, schools are typically less accessible than libraries, especially during evenings and in the summer.

Affordability is another key issue. Industry Canada is attempting to document the current situation, such as cost differences between rural and urban communities. Models of affordable access are being developed for consideration by federal and provincial Ministers. They will also be assessing the issue of minimum standards of public access, as well as options to address the huge regional variations in cost to build the infrastructure to enable all Canadians to have access to the Internet. Participants wanted to explore further how the federal government might use its leverage to encourage telephone service into all communities.

Finally, participants pointed to the critical issue of the training of library professionals to support these initiatives. While there is a potential link to the work of ALARM, the federal government's withdrawal of direct support for training has placed all training funding in the hands of provinces. Their priorities are more likely to be on the long-term unemployed than on the upgrading of professionals.


go to  top of page

Emerging Roles of Public Libraries

In order to most effectively position LibraryNet for mutual advantage, participants explored the emerging roles of public libraries.

Public libraries serve a role as economic incubators. In this role, they stimulate public discussion of the use and value of information, foster and lead specific projects to translate this discussion into action, and proactively stimulate the market for certain kinds of information. Such information might cover job creation in niche markets and types of business which are less dependent on physical location. In this capacity, public libraries work with organizations providing advice and education on economic development.

The related role of educational support is being reinforced by the growth of modular learning among adults and youth. Work life and other demands create needs to serve people at a distance. Such library users must be independent of "physical place", but still connected. Support to adults' social and information needs, including those of life-long learning, is a role which schools are also seeking. A recent Nova Scotia survey ("Public Libraries in Nova Scotia: General Population Survey", April 1997) identified one of libraries' primary roles as that of "educational support centre for learners of all ages". (The other important public library roles identified in the Nova Scotia survey were "centre for research and reference information" and "discovery and learning centre for young children".) In some regions, as a result of educational funding cut-backs and other decisions, public libraries are becoming, de facto, school libraries.

The reference and information role has changed dramatically as libraries sort through the "muddle" created by the information explosion. Validating, organizing and packaging information helps users to distinguish authoritative sources for retrieval. This can include the creation of content on the Internet which people can access from other locations (the "virtual library"). Public libraries will continue to have a role in the direct delivery of information and in the provision of advice around that information.

Any discussion of emerging roles must reaffirm an existing role of equalizing opportunities for access to information. This reflects a strong value within the public library community. Free access is crucial to preserving that value. Technology allows greater access than ever before. In this regard, libraries have a role to help patrons and users to be computer- and Internet-literate: this can be especially useful in rural communities. Access to equipment, such as printers and scanners, is important to many library users. Partnerships can support libraries in providing better service, through technology, improved collections and other means. Public libraries can take advantage of consortia purchasing and collective acquisition of master licenses to reduce costs and so help ensure access.

Some participants expressed concern that members of traditionally disadvantaged groups may be receiving less service, even as new users (e.g. 18-40 year-old males) are being drawn into public libraries by the available technology. With fewer resources, customer service is suffering. The Internet is still, to some, a middle-and upper-class phenomenon. Public libraries focusing on this service may not be meeting the needs of the severely disadvantaged. An associated concern is that traditional supporters of public libraries may see them as irrelevant or unimportant in light of technological change.

Others felt that more library staff are "out front" providing service than ever before. Technology has freed up resources, rather than drawn them away. People with disabilities, youth, the poor, seniors and others on the "fringe" now have access through the Internet to sources which were previously unavailable. In some regions, public libraries are the only source of Internet access for many community members.

Public libraries are increasingly serving as cultural gateways for communities. Libraries provide facilities for other organizations, helping them to create web sites and other communications tools. Libraries support community networks, bringing agencies together and informing the community about itself and its cultures. In their focus on community, libraries support citizens pursuing democratic goals. As well, individuals are using public libraries to express their own creative works to the wider world, through vehicles such as the Internet. Libraries serve as "publishers" of those individuals. Such support reinforces important values held by public libraries. It also highlights the interactive potential of libraries as modern-day "salon hosts". In this regard, libraries' role as validator of information rests at the retrieval, rather than at the expressive, stage.

Revenue generation is increasingly important for public libraries. The Internet could prove to be a source of revenue. Businesses and community organizations could pay for services, such as preparation of world-wide web sites, training in basic skills for the information highway, etc. Such basic services can stimulate an appetite for more specialized ones, which can be provided by for-profit organizations in the community.

Recreational reading and information remains a core role of public libraries. Some, such as the Vancouver Public Library, are even becoming tourist destinations! Finally, advocacy is key to the continued effectiveness and relevance of public libraries. Participants emphasized the need to have the above goals and objectives of public libraries on the agendas of every level of government across Canada.

 


go to  top of page

Round-Table with Doug Hull

Doug Hull, Director General, Science Promotion and Academic Affairs, Industry Canada, joined the workshop for a round-table discussion on the morning of June 16. Mr. Hull opened his remarks by noting that schools and libraries are not traditional areas of activity for an economic development department such as Industry Canada. However, SchoolNet and LibraryNet make sense in the context of community development and the new economy of small, dynamic firms working in active communities. Connectivity will be a major engine of such development.

The Community Access Program has successfully focused Ministers' attention on community economic development and connectivity. The federal government is looking for things to accomplish. It needs new, imaginative, bold ideas that address a range of issues (youth, national unity, economic development, etc.) simultaneously. Connectivity is an area which satisfies that need. To date, the voices of public libraries have been less audible to policy-makers than those of the telecommunications firms ("telcos"). Libraries will receive attention when they start to take initiatives. To this end, libraries need to identify the key things they want to accomplish through LibraryNet.

Telcos have made public commitments to lower telecommunication rates for schools and libraries, but have so far presented no proposals. Industry Canada has been studying the costs for libraries to become access points. There is potential for public libraries to join together in a national buying program for connectivity: as "national" customers, libraries would get preferred rates. This would have special benefit for rural communities.

Industry Canada is developing a vision of public access to the Internet. The Community Access Program is growing by 100% each year. Industry Canada aims to have 10,000 "sustainable access points" for public accessibility to the information highway. This is seen as important to Canada's overall social, political and economic development. The national costs are relatively modest. The question is what role public libraries will play in contributing to connectivity and public access. Libraries will lose any role they might have if they are not prepared to collectively make their case and take control. In the immediate term, Mr. Hull suggested that public libraries move on several fronts:

  • seek lower rates by combined purchasing;
  • address the issue of sustainable, broad-based public access; and,
  • be prepared to "pay if they want to play".

Participants raised several issues during the round-table. One involved the link between federal and provincial initiatives. Some provinces are exploring fibre optic and cable, which are less expensive and better than other approaches. It was hoped that the federal and provincial governments could combine resources.

Some public libraries feel it is important to uncouple libraries and schools, despite the fact that governments often link the two. There is better understanding at the community level of the distinctiveness of libraries. Libraries are seen differently from schools as community access points. Each type of institution is accessed by the public in very different ways.

Several participants argued that governments' goals for citizen access to the information highway often seem to be devices for downloading costs to libraries and individuals. Governments do not meet their responsibilities simply by publishing material electronically. This issue is central to the role of governments in serving the information needs of citizens in an informed, democratic society.

Public libraries want some of the money which governments are saving by downloading their information responsibilities. While different communities will take different positions on issues of price and access, libraries must signal cost realities back to information providers. Information technology is changing the economics of all libraries. It would violate a core value of public libraries to use lack of reimbursement as a threat to block public access to information. Nevertheless, information providers, such as governments, will be expected to pay for distribution services which they previously provided. The broad issue is how to capture the billions of dollars of distribution value represented by electronic dissemination.

Training of public library staff remains a critical issue in ensuring that the benefits of connectivity can be realized. British Columbia has a curriculum and process to support librarians in providing training to the public. Information on this package will be circulated. It may be usefully applied in other settings.

Some participants expressed concern that Industry Canada's moves to sign memoranda of understanding with provinces on the management of CAP have not involved public libraries. Different groups have been involved in each province. It was suggested that the CAP committee structure is the most effective vehicle for library representation. There is a need for provincial strategies that go beyond mere reaction.

There was great interest in proposals to work with Mbanx. Mr. Hull felt it important to ensure agreement among all the parties and adequate time for discussion. Efforts are being made to find practical models (through CAP sites) that can be used. It has been decided that New Brunswick will have an initial pilot site: Ontario and Alberta are also identifying sites. While there is a desire to respond as quickly as possible to Mbanx and New Brunswick, Mr. Hull doubted that progress would be as fast or as straightforward as hoped. Industry Canada prefers that a common approach be taken with the banks. He promised to keep participants informed of discussions.

In closing, Mr. Hull emphasized his desire that LibraryNet work to a common agenda between Industry Canada and the public libraries. The need is to produce results over the next 18 months.


go to  top of page

Ensuring Mutual Benefit

Participants next brainstormed ideas around the issue statement "Ensuring mutual benefit from LibraryNet". (The output of the initial brainstorming is found in Appendix A to these notes.) The ideas were then regrouped into themes (Appendix B). Success indicators and key actions, accountabilities and "paying partners" were identified for most themes. These are provided in this section.

A. Funding

Success Indicators

  • funding is in place for Canadians to have access from all public library service points (8500) within a minimum service framework;
  • there is funding stability over time;
  • we meet local needs/expectations for information services; and,
  • there is a funding breakthrough for LibraryNet (i.e. $200,000,000).

Key Actions

  1. $200,000,000 for (public) LibraryNet in 1998 federal budget.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, LibraryNet Group, CAPL/CLA/ASTED, National Library
    • Paying Partners: federal effort
  2. Federal throne speech commitment for LibraryNet 1997-98.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, National Library
    • Paying Partners: federal effort
  3. Stream of private sector money for libraries negotiated by the end of 1998.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, LibraryNet GroupPaying
    • Partners: industry groups, public libraries (in kind)
  4. Compensation for public library delivery of government (all levels) information and services at 50% of 1997 costs for information distribution for each government.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, LibraryNet Group
    • Paying Partners: governments

B. Telecommunications Rates

Success Indicators

  • there are high-speed links with every library in Canada; and,
  • library rates are preferential, national, stable rates at best government/bulk rate for all libraries.

Key Actions

  1. Negotiate a nation-wide bulk telecom rate structure for public libraries by September 1997.
    • Accountability: LibraryNet Group, Industry Canada
    • Paying Partners: public libraries and/or province (for public libraries), Industry Canada/federal government
  2. Secure federal (CRTC) policy decision requiring that education/library rates be equivalent to best government/bulk rates in Canada by September 1997.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, LibraryNet Group, CLA/CAPL/ASTED
    • Paying Partners: Stentor/telcos, Industry Canada and/or federal government, library systems
  3. Telcos required by government policy to provide high-speed telecommunication links to all Canadian communities with a public library by the end of 1998.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, LibraryNet Group
    • Paying Partners: Stentor/telcos, Industry Canada and/or federal government, library systems

C. Advocacy

Success Indicators

  • there is a heightened profile in policy;
  • there is money;
  • the public has confidence to ask more of libraries and identifies roles;
  • there is congruence of political agendas and library agendas; and,
  • there is a recognition by the federal government of role for libraries.

Key Actions

  1. Training
    • Industry Canada funding to support existing programs (e.g. Library Advocacy Now)
    • Library community sessions in each province/territory within 18 months
    • Accountability: CLA/ASTED
  2. Research
    • "Angus Reid" type survey (e.g. Nova Scotia) valid at provincial level
    • Research by library schools/libraries
    • Economic analysis/cost-benefit analysis
    • Software development research
    • Paying Partners: libraries via PTLDC, Industry Canada, National Library, vendors
  3. Public Relations
    • Prime responsibility of local library/local media
    • Feliciter
    • National/provincial coverage
    • Sharing what works/what doesn't
    • Accountability: ASTED/CLA, Canadian Heritage, Industry Canada support for research, public as advocates

Note: Training, Research and Public Relations must be persistent, consistent, ongoing and long-term. Be prepared for their "spin".

D. Library Voice

Success Indicator

  • the library community is perceived as speaking with one voice (in spite of two languages) to the same audience.

Key Actions

  1. Determine who can commit libraries: no one except each library (New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland the exceptions).
  2. Library community needs communication.
  3. Hold public library "summit" to develop consistent positions
    • Accountability: CAPL/ CLTA/ ASTED, Industry Canada, National Library
    • Timeframe: one year

E. Integrated Content

Success Indicators

  • there is a formula of funding which is mutually beneficial;
  • we know what kinds of information are most necessary to the community;
  • there is single-window, seamless access to different types/formats of information;
  • the library community is working with the private sector in developing appropriate interfaces; and,
  • people (library staff) are properly trained in the two success indicators above.

Key Actions

  1. Action related to citizens' input to community information needs (survey tool).
    • Accountability: centrally-coordinated steering committee working with private company; LibraryNet sub-group, National Library, Industry Canada authorize survey questions
    • Timeframe: 6 months
    • Paying Partners: Industry Canada, provincial/local support for "citizens" representatives, facilities for focus groups, distribution of survey, etc.
  2. Establish/get buy-in to best practice/standards (e.g. GILS, Dublin Core) and train core group of trainers across the country.
    • Z39.50 connecting link full text
    • SGML to HTML
    • GILS: metadata for data base, e-documents, etc.
    • Accountability: National Library, library associations, Treasury Board, Public Works and Government Services Canada, library schools/consortia of provincial governments/legislative/provincial libraries
    • Timeframe: program in place June 1998
    • Paying Partners: federal government, provincial governments, universities, those who benefit should pay
  3. Commission development of user interface for presentation and delivery of government information.
    • Accountability: Industry Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada, National Library, advisory committee from broad library community
    • Timeframe: 12 months
    • Paying Partners: federal government, provincial governments
  4. Persuade government to use public libraries as regular, accepted vehicles for the delivery of government information.
    • Accountability: DSP program, Treasury Board, federal departments working together to demonstrate leadership (Directors General and above), provinces kept informed so they can develop models and strategies

F. Training

Success Indicators

  • all public services staff in Canadian public libraries are competent Internet searchers;
  • all public libraries have access to Internet training for new staff and skills upgrading;
  • the public can receive one-on-one orientation to the electronic sources; and,
  • the public can receive self-instruction through software packages provided by the public library.

Key Actions

  1. Obtain Industry Canada support for provincial library training programs:
    • obtain British Columbia training plan/package
    • Accountability: federal government: purchase/procurement/translation; provinces: delivery costs; public libraries: travel, staff
    • provide access to training packages on the Internet
    • use Youth Employment Strategy funds to develop components of provincial strategies
    • Accountability: provinces, Industry Canada

G. Standards

Success Indicators

  • a librarian is consistently involved when government information is mounted on the World Wide Web (recognition of librarians' knowledge of organization of information);
  • library school graduates are competent in designing, organizing, creating, and searching electronic information; and,
  • Industry Canada and other federal departments assume a leadership role in presenting government information electronically in a standardized, consistent manner.

H. New Relationships

Success Indicator

  • public libraries have the resources to fulfill their mission/role (but life will be more complicated).

go to  top of page

Next Steps

  • Discuss with Industry Canada the proposed national research projects on expectations and attitudes.
    • Accountability: Marion Pape (lead), Diane Bays, Benoit Ferland, Gwynneth Evans
    • Deadline: July 31, 1997
  • Test interest in "one voice" at CLA conference.
    • Accountability: Greg Buss, Wendy Newman, Pierre Meunier
    • Deadline: June 20, 1997
    • feedback to public library "summit" group (see no. 3 below) via Karen Adams
  • Initiate organization of public library "summit" (as outlined in "Library Voice" above).
    • Accountability: Harry Holman (lead), Barbara Greeniaus, Karen Adams, Diane Bays
    • Deadline: July 3, 1997
  • Present proposal to Industry Canada for national training model based initially on British Columbia approach.
    • Accountability: Barbara Greeniaus (lead), Greg Buss, Diane Bays
    • Deadline: September 1, 1997
    • Note: Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan offer to be first pilot sites
  • Develop framework for program to establish standards and training for the organization of electronic resources.
    • Accountability: Gwynneth Evans, Diane Bays
    • Deadline: October 15, 1997
  • Obtain guidance in working with CRTC during its current round of hearings on rate structure.
    • Accountability: Stan Squires (lead), Wendy Newman, Maggie Macdonald
    • Deadline: June 20, 1997
  • Organize submission to CRTC on telecommunication rates.
    • Accountability: CLA, ASTED
  • Prepare briefing papers on CLA resolution regarding telecommunication rates for attendees at fall 1997 meeting of federal/provincial/territorial "information highway" Ministers.
    • Accountability: CLA resolution: Karen Adams, Diane Bays; briefing papers: provincial/territorial directors
    • Deadline: CLA resolution: June 21, 1997; briefing papers: August 31, 1997
  • Secure funding commitment for LibraryNet in next federal throne speech/budget.
    • Accountability: Gwynneth Evans, Diane Bays, Stan Squires, Punch Jackson (Alberta)
    • Deadline: input/decision deadline for throne speech/budget
    • Actions:
      • library community express support for Prime Minister's election commitment (Diane Bays distribute text)
      • CLA resolution of support
      • work with library trustees
      • ASTED resolution
      • PTLDC resolution

 

..last modified: 2003.06.11 important notices..
Archived by Library and Archives Canada / Archivé par Bibliothèque et archives Canada. 20-10-2004.